250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22058661)
1. Parameterization of a B3LYP specific correction for non-covalent interactions and basis set superposition error on a gigantic dataset of CCSD(T) quality non-covalent interaction energies.
Schneebeli ST; Bochevarov AD; Friesner RA
J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Mar; 7(3):658-668. PubMed ID: 22058661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heats of Formation of Medium-Sized Organic Compounds from Contemporary Electronic Structure Methods.
Minenkov Y; Wang H; Wang Z; Sarathy SM; Cavallo L
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Aug; 13(8):3537-3560. PubMed ID: 28636351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Approximations to complete basis set-extrapolated, highly correlated non-covalent interaction energies.
Mackie ID; DiLabio GA
J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(13):134318. PubMed ID: 21992316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of conventional and dispersion-corrected density-functional theory methods for hydrogen bonding interaction energies.
DiLabio GA; Johnson ER; Otero-de-la-Roza A
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Aug; 15(31):12821-8. PubMed ID: 23803877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A geometrical correction for the inter- and intra-molecular basis set superposition error in Hartree-Fock and density functional theory calculations for large systems.
Kruse H; Grimme S
J Chem Phys; 2012 Apr; 136(15):154101. PubMed ID: 22519309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: a comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals.
Burns LA; Vázquez-Mayagoitia A; Sumpter BG; Sherrill CD
J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(8):084107. PubMed ID: 21361527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the behavior of functional/basis set combinations for hydrogen-bonding in the water dimer with emphasis on basis set superposition error.
Plumley JA; Dannenberg JJ
J Comput Chem; 2011 Jun; 32(8):1519-27. PubMed ID: 21328398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of B3LYP, X3LYP, and M06-Class Density Functionals for Predicting the Binding Energies of Neutral, Protonated, and Deprotonated Water Clusters.
Bryantsev VS; Diallo MS; van Duin AC; Goddard WA
J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Apr; 5(4):1016-26. PubMed ID: 26609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Big data benchmarking: how do DFT methods across the rungs of Jacob's ladder perform for a dataset of 122k CCSD(T) total atomization energies?
Karton A
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 May; 26(20):14594-14606. PubMed ID: 38738470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Troubles in the Systematic Prediction of Transition Metal Thermochemistry with Contemporary Out-of-the-Box Methods.
Minenkov Y; Chermak E; Cavallo L
J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Apr; 12(4):1542-60. PubMed ID: 27002380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
Hobza P
Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the Performance of DFT and DFT-D Methods for Describing Distance Dependence of Hydrogen-Bonded Interactions.
Thanthiriwatte KS; Hohenstein EG; Burns LA; Sherrill CD
J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Jan; 7(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 26606221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benchmark Data for Noncovalent Interactions in HCOOH···Benzene Complexes and Their Use for Validation of Density Functionals.
Zhao Y; Ng HT; Hanson E
J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Oct; 5(10):2726-33. PubMed ID: 26631785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A scheme for rapid evaluation of the intermolecular three-body polarization effect in water clusters.
Li XL; Li CM; Zhu JY; Zhou Z; Hao Q; Wang CS
J Comput Chem; 2023 Feb; 44(5):677-686. PubMed ID: 36408852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Systematic Study of DFT Performance for Geometry Optimizations of Ionic Liquid Clusters.
Seeger ZL; Izgorodina EI
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Oct; 16(10):6735-6753. PubMed ID: 32865998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appropriate description of intermolecular interactions in the methane hydrates: an assessment of DFT methods.
Liu Y; Zhao J; Li F; Chen Z
J Comput Chem; 2013 Jan; 34(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 22949382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved Polarizable Dipole-Dipole Interaction Model for Hydrogen Bonding, Stacking, T-Shaped, and X-H···π Interactions.
Gao XC; Hao Q; Wang CS
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jun; 13(6):2730-2741. PubMed ID: 28489370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Density functional theory including dispersion corrections for intermolecular interactions in a large benchmark set of biologically relevant molecules.
Antony J; Grimme S
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2006 Dec; 8(45):5287-93. PubMed ID: 19810407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multi-level quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics study of SN2 reaction at nitrogen: NH2Cl + OH(-) in aqueous solution.
Lv J; Zhang J; Wang D
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Feb; 18(8):6146-52. PubMed ID: 26847380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. True stabilization energies for the optimal planar hydrogen-bonded and stacked structures of guanine...cytosine, adenine...thymine, and their 9- and 1-methyl derivatives: complete basis set calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) levels and comparison with experiment.
Jurecka P; Hobza P
J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Dec; 125(50):15608-13. PubMed ID: 14664608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
