These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22059579)

  • 1. Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes.
    de Cara MA; Fernández J; Toro MA; Villanueva B
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22059579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consequences for diversity when prioritizing animals for conservation with pedigree or genomic information.
    Engelsma KA; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP; Windig JJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 22059581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes.
    de Cara MÁ; Villanueva B; Toro MÁ; Fernández J
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(24):6091-9. PubMed ID: 24128280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preserving population allele frequencies in ex situ conservation programs.
    Saura M; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández J; Toro MA; Caballero A
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1277-87. PubMed ID: 18680505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ex situ population management in the absence of pedigree information.
    Russello MA; Amato G
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Sep; 13(9):2829-40. PubMed ID: 15315693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry: the effect of marker density and effective population size.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; de Cara MA; Fernández J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):38. PubMed ID: 24088414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.
    Fernández J; Villanueva B; Pong-Wong R; Toro MA
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1313-21. PubMed ID: 15879510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximization of total genetic variance in breed conservation programmes.
    Cervantes I; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 22059580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations.
    Bosse M; Megens HJ; Madsen O; Crooijmans RP; Ryder OA; Austerlitz F; Groenen MA; de Cara MA
    Genome Res; 2015 Jul; 25(7):970-81. PubMed ID: 26063737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objectives, criteria and methods for using molecular genetic data in priority setting for conservation of animal genetic resources.
    Boettcher PJ; Tixier-Boichard M; Toro MA; Simianer H; Eding H; Gandini G; Joost S; Garcia D; Colli L; Ajmone-Marsan P;
    Anim Genet; 2010 May; 41 Suppl 1():64-77. PubMed ID: 20500756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marker-assisted conservation of European cattle breeds: An evaluation.
    European Cattle Genetic Diversity Consortium
    Anim Genet; 2006 Oct; 37(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 16978177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods and prospects for using molecular data in captive breeding programs: an empirical example using parma wallabies (Macropus parma).
    Ivy JA; Miller A; Lacy RC; Dewoody JA
    J Hered; 2009; 100(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 19423700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomics and conservation genetics.
    Kohn MH; Murphy WJ; Ostrander EA; Wayne RK
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Nov; 21(11):629-37. PubMed ID: 16908089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigations on merging breeds in genetic conservation schemes.
    Bennewitz J; Simianer H; Meuwissen TH
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jun; 91(6):2512-9. PubMed ID: 18487675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic approaches refine ex situ lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) conservation.
    Gonçalves da Silva A; Lalonde DR; Quse V; Shoemaker A; Russello MA
    J Hered; 2010; 101(5):581-90. PubMed ID: 20484384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers.
    Toro MA; García-Cortés LA; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jul; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21749687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How developments in cryobiology, reproductive technologies and conservation genomics could shape gene banking strategies for (farm) animals.
    Woelders H; Windig J; Hiemstra SJ
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2012 Aug; 47 Suppl 4():264-73. PubMed ID: 22827380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Founder effects, inbreeding, and loss of genetic diversity in four avian reintroduction programs.
    Jamieson IG
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 20825445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impacts of early viability selection on management of inbreeding and genetic diversity in conservation.
    Grueber CE; Hogg CJ; Ivy JA; Belov K
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Apr; 24(8):1645-53. PubMed ID: 25735639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extending pedigree analysis for uncertain parentage and diverse breeding systems.
    Lacy RC
    J Hered; 2012; 103(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 22275398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.