47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22059610)
21. Microbiological conditions of detained beef carcasses before and after removal of visible contamination.
Gill CO; Landers C
Meat Sci; 2004 Feb; 66(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 22064136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Control of Salmonella on Beef Tissue Surfaces in a Model System by Pre- and Post-Evisceration Washing and Sanitizing, With and Without Spray Chilling.
Dickson JS; Anderson ME
J Food Prot; 1991 Jul; 54(7):514-518. PubMed ID: 31051547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Problems associated with commercial lamb washing in Ireland.
Sheridan JJ
Meat Sci; 1982 Apr; 6(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 22054865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Re:(In) visible impact of inadequate WaSH Provision on COVID-19 incidences can be not be ignored in large and megacities of India.
Das A; Ghosh S; Das K; Dutta I; Basu T; Das M
Public Health; 2020 Aug; 185():34-36. PubMed ID: 32521329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [A case of acid-wash poisoning].
Xu QL; Jian XD; Wu J
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 36(3):228-229. PubMed ID: 29996234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Less wash, more dry.
Krakovsky M
Sci Am; 2008 Nov; 299(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 18998340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Elegant Mouth Wash.
Dent Regist; 1888 Feb; 42(2):94. PubMed ID: 33699297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. EYE-WASH (COLLYRIUM).
Macdonald AE
Can Med Assoc J; 1939 Jul; 41(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 20321408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Best Tooth Wash.
Halls J Health; 1876 Feb; 23(2):85. PubMed ID: 36490449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Tooth Wash.
Halls J Health; 1856 Oct; 3(10):228. PubMed ID: 36485658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Best Alkaline Wash.
Sloan WH
Buffalo Med J; 1901 Dec; 41(5):357-358. PubMed ID: 36885489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How to Wash the Baby.
Maginnis LP
Tex Med J (Austin); 1900 Nov; 16(5):208. PubMed ID: 36954850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Sluice talk.
Atkinson J
Nurs Stand; 1993 Jun; 7(38):44. PubMed ID: 27656824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Sluice talk.
Warriner J
Nurs Stand; 1993 Sep; 7(50):44. PubMed ID: 27680476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance characteristics of three different pre-evisceration wash regimes applied to the forequarters of ovine carcasses in an inverted dressing system.
Biss ME; Hathaway SC
Meat Sci; 1994; 38(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 22059610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microbiological contamination of ovine carcasses associated with the presence of wool and faecal material.
Biss ME; Hathaway SC
J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 Dec; 81(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 8972086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Enhanced control of microbiological contamination of product at a large beef packing plant.
Yang X; Badoni M; Youssef MK; Gill CO
J Food Prot; 2012 Jan; 75(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 22221368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of different on-line dressing practices on microbiological and visible contamination of lamb carcasses.
Biss ME; Hathaway SC
N Z Vet J; 1996 Apr; 44(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 16031894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The hygienic efficiency of conventional and inverted lamb dressing systems.
Bell RG; Hathaway SC
J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 Sep; 81(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 8810052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microbiological and Visible Contamination of Lamb Carcasses According to Preslaughter Presentation Status: Implications for HACCP.
Hiss ME; Hathawar SC
J Food Prot; 1995 Jul; 58(7):776-783. PubMed ID: 31137329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
