These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching. Druey MD; Hübner R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding. Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning. Braem S; Verguts T; Notebaert W J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1662-6. PubMed ID: 21728466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Schneider DW; Logan GD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Caffeine improves anticipatory processes in task switching. Tieges Z; Snel J; Kok A; Wijnen JG; Lorist MM; Richard Ridderinkhof K Biol Psychol; 2006 Aug; 73(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 16549227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implicit task sets in task switching? Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. Altmann EM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment. Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks. Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries. Wong J; Leboe JP Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 19271811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Working memory costs of task switching. Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs. Lindsen JP; de Jong R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses. Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Behavioural and electrophysiological measures of task switching during single and mixed-task conditions. Goffaux P; Phillips NA; Sinai M; Pushkar D Biol Psychol; 2006 Jun; 72(3):278-90. PubMed ID: 16413655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]