These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22060911)

  • 1. Development of technology for the early post mortem prediction of water holding capacity and drip loss in fresh pork.
    Forrest JC; Morgan MT; Borggaard C; Rasmussen AJ; Jespersen BL; Andersen JR
    Meat Sci; 2000 May; 55(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 22060911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perspective of NIRS measurements early post mortem for prediction of pork quality.
    Hoving-Bolink AH; Vedder HW; Merks JW; de Klein WJ; Reimert HG; Frankhuizen R; van den Broek WH; Lambooij EE
    Meat Sci; 2005 Mar; 69(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22062979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive value of slaughterhouse measurements of ultimate pork quality in seven halothane negative Yorkshire populations.
    van der Wal PG; de Vries AG; Eikelenboom G
    Meat Sci; 1995; 40(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 22059970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moisture absorption early postmortem predicts ultimate drip loss in fresh pork.
    Kapper C; Walukonis CJ; Scheffler TL; Scheffler JM; Don C; Morgan MT; Forrest JC; Gerrard DE
    Meat Sci; 2014 Feb; 96(2 Pt A):971-6. PubMed ID: 24225387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of pork quality attributes from near infrared reflectance spectra.
    Geesink GH; Schreutelkamp FH; Frankhuizen R; Vedder HW; Faber NM; Kranen RW; Gerritzen MA
    Meat Sci; 2003 Sep; 65(1):661-8. PubMed ID: 22063261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prediction of water holding capacity of fresh pork using near infrared spectroscopy].
    Hu YH; Guo KQ; Noguchi G; Kawano S; Satake T
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2009 Dec; 29(12):3259-62. PubMed ID: 20210145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological and structural events post mortem of importance for drip loss in pork.
    Schäfer A; Rosenvold K; Purslow PP; Andersen HJ; Henckel P
    Meat Sci; 2002 Aug; 61(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 22061063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of fluid losses from pork using subjective and objective paleness.
    Irie M; Swatland HJ
    Meat Sci; 1993; 33(3):277-92. PubMed ID: 22060147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of low voltage electrical stimulation of pig carcasses and ageing on sensory attributes of fresh pork.
    Channon HA; Baud SR; Kerr MG; Walker PJ
    Meat Sci; 2003 Dec; 65(4):1315-24. PubMed ID: 22063775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on the relationships between measures of water holding capacity in the M. longissimus dorsi and total drip loss from butchered pig carcasses during storage.
    Lopez-Bote C; Warriss PD
    Meat Sci; 1988; 23(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 22055671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of time of deboning and sample size on drip loss of pork.
    Van Moeseke W; De Smet S
    Meat Sci; 1999 Jun; 52(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22062366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fibre optic probe measurements in landrace pigs of different halothane phenotypes.
    Eikelenboom G; Nanni Costa L
    Meat Sci; 1988; 23(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 22055471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of simulated transport of fresh meats on their water-holding capacity as assessed by various methods.
    den Hertog-Meischke MJ; Vada-Kovács M; Smulders FJ
    Meat Sci; 1997 May; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22061840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of water-holding capacity and composition of porcine meat by comparative spectroscopy.
    Brøndum J; Munck L; Henckel P; Karlsson A; Tornberg E; Engelsen SB
    Meat Sci; 2000 Jun; 55(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 22061083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of electrical conductivity to predict water-holding capacity in post-rigor pork.
    Lee S; Norman JM; Gunasekaran S; van Laack RL; Kim BC; Kauffman RG
    Meat Sci; 2000 Aug; 55(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 22061569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of the relationships of pH with physical aspects of pork quality.
    Bendall JR; Swatland HJ
    Meat Sci; 1988; 24(2):85-126. PubMed ID: 22055884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of some objective methods for measuring pork quality.
    Somers C; Tarrant PV; Sherington J
    Meat Sci; 1985; 15(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 22056125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preslaughter stress and muscle energy largely determine pork quality at two commercial processing plants.
    Hambrecht E; Eissen JJ; Nooijent RI; Ducro BJ; Smits CH; den Hartog LA; Verstegen MW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1401-9. PubMed ID: 15144080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of technological quality (cooking loss and Napole Yield) of pork based on fresh meat characteristics.
    Bertram HC; Andersen HJ; Karlsson AH; Horn P; Hedegaard J; Nørgaard L; Engelsen SB
    Meat Sci; 2003 Oct; 65(2):707-12. PubMed ID: 22063431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the Tecpro Pork Quality Meter for assessing meat quality on the slaughterline.
    Warriss PD; Brown SN; Adams SJ
    Meat Sci; 1991; 30(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 22061832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.