These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22061881)

  • 1. Effect of meat appearance on consumer preferences for pork chops in Greece and Cyprus.
    Fortomaris P; Arsenos G; Georgiadis M; Banos G; Stamataris C; Zygoyiannis D
    Meat Sci; 2006 Apr; 72(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 22061881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of intrinsic search cues in the formation of consumer preferences and choice for pork chops.
    Verbeke W; De Smet S; Vackier I; Van Oeckel MJ; Warnants N; Van Kenhove P
    Meat Sci; 2005 Feb; 69(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 22062827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumer choice of pork chops in Taiwan.
    Chen MT; Guo HL; Tseng TF; Roan SW; Ngapo TM
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jul; 85(3):555-9. PubMed ID: 20416840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do pig farmers preferences bias consumer choice for pork? Response to critique of the pork preference studies.
    Ngapo TM; Fortin J; Martin JF
    Meat Sci; 2010 Aug; 85(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 20416804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer preferences for pork chops in five Canadian provinces.
    Ngapo TM
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():102-110. PubMed ID: 28268205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do all the consumers accept marbling in the same way? The relationship between eating and visual acceptability of pork with different intramuscular fat content.
    Font-i-Furnols M; Tous N; Esteve-Garcia E; Gispert M
    Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 22429803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Final internal cooking temperature of pork chops influenced consumer eating experience more than visual color and marbling or ultimate pH.
    Honegger LT; Richardson E; Schunke ED; Dilger AC; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2019 May; 97(6):2460-2467. PubMed ID: 30968136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.
    Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production.
    Dransfield E; Ngapo TM; Nielsen NA; Bredahl L; Sjödén PO; Magnusson M; Campo MM; Nute GR
    Meat Sci; 2005 Jan; 69(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 22062640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops.
    Rincker PJ; Killefer J; Ellis M; Brewer MS; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):730-7. PubMed ID: 18156359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer satisfaction with pork meat and derived products in five European countries.
    Resano H; Perez-Cueto FJ; de Barcellos MD; Veflen-Olsen N; Grunert KG; Verbeke W
    Appetite; 2011 Feb; 56(1):167-70. PubMed ID: 21029759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of sensory quality of pork on consumer preference.
    Aaslyng MD; Oksama M; Olsen EV; Bejerholm C; Baltzer M; Andersen G; Bredie WL; Byrne DV; Gabrielsen G
    Meat Sci; 2007 May; 76(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 22064192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumers' expected quality and intention to purchase high quality pork meat.
    Papanagiotou P; Tzimitra-Kalogianni I; Melfou K
    Meat Sci; 2013 Mar; 93(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 23273449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color.
    Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3288-93. PubMed ID: 15542475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Pork choice.
    Ngapo TM; Rubio Lozano MS; Braña Varela D
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():27-35. PubMed ID: 28863351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptability of boar meat by consumers depending on their age, gender, culinary habits, and sensitivity and appreciation of androstenone odour.
    Font I Furnols M; Gispert M; Diestre A; Oliver MA
    Meat Sci; 2003 Aug; 64(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 22063125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marbling effects on quality characteristics of pork loin chops: consumer purchase intent, visual and sensory characteristics.
    Brewer MS; Zhu LG; McKeith FK
    Meat Sci; 2001 Oct; 59(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 22062673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meat packaging, preservation, and marketing implications: Consumer preferences in an emerging economy.
    Wang HH; Chen J; Bai J; Lai J
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():300-307. PubMed ID: 30007176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.