87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2206193)
1. Method for the quantitative evaluation of the distribution pattern of nuclei in normal and malignant endometrial epithelia.
Tezuka F; Sato I; Higashiiwai H; Endo N; Ito K; Kasai M
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1990 Aug; 12(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 2206193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative analysis of nuclear distribution pattern differentiating carcinoma from hyperplasia in endometrial cytologic studies.
Tezuka F; Higashiwai H; Namiki T
Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Nov; 96(5):648-53. PubMed ID: 1951187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuclear and nucleolar areas: a quantitative assessment of endometrial neoplasia.
Roberts DK; Lavia LA; Freedman RS; Horbelt DV; Busby-Walker N
Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 3763087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endometrial cytology and computerized morphometric analysis of epithelial nuclei: a useful tool for reproductive diagnosis in the bitch.
Groppetti D; Pecile A; Arrighi S; Di Giancamillo A; Cremonesi F
Theriogenology; 2010 Apr; 73(7):927-41. PubMed ID: 20116837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Ultrastructure of the ectopic endometrial glandular epithelium in five cases of adenomyosis--with particular reference to the normal proliferative endometrium and endometrial adenocarcinoma].
Hayata T; Kawashima Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jun; 37(6):879-87. PubMed ID: 4020200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphometric analysis of nuclei in epithelial structures from normal and neoplastic endometrium: a study using the Isaacs cell sampler and Endoscann instruments.
Skaarland E
J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 38(5):496-501. PubMed ID: 3889067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative nuclear image analysis: differentiation between normal, hyperplastic, and malignant appearing uterine glands in a paraffin section. II. Computer assisted recognition by discriminant analysis.
Diegenbach PC; Baak JP
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1977; 7(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 264067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Biometric research in the cytomorphological diagnosis of endometrial lesions].
Novik VI; Agroskin LS; Papaian GV; Solov'eva LV
Eksp Onkol; 1990; 12(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 2318130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital imaging analysis of normal, hyperplastic and malignant endometrial cells in endometrial brushing samples.
Fu YS; Ferenczy A; Huang I; Gelfand MM
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1988 Apr; 10(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 3390290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital image analysis of silver-stained nucleolar organizer region--associated proteins in endometrial cytologic samples.
Mahovlić V; Audy-Jurković S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Bilusić M; Veldić M; Babić D; Bozikov J; Danilović Z
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Feb; 21(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 10068775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer assisted efficiency testing of different sampling methods for selective nuclear graphic tablet morphometry.
Fleege JC; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Lab Invest; 1990 Aug; 63(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 2381167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nuclear features in endometrial cytology: comparison of endometrial glandular and stromal breakdown and endometrioid adenocarcinoma grade 1.
Norimatsu Y; Shigematsu Y; Sakamoto S; Ohsaki H; Yanoh K; Kawanishi N; Kobayashi TK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22241733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nuclear chromatin patterns in normal, hyperplastic and atypical endometrium.
Garcia FA; Davis JR; Alberts DS; Hatch K; Weyn B; Thompson D; Bartels PH
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Apr; 23(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 11332081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progression curves for endometrial lesions.
Bartels PH; Garcia FA; Davis J; da Silva VD; Bartels HG; Thompson D; Alberts DS
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Feb; 23(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11233737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An ultrastructural comparison of human endometrial adenocarcinoma with normal postmenopausal endometrium.
Aycock NR; Jollie WP; Dunn LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1979 May; 53(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 440667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume in endometrial lesions.
Artacho-Pérula E; Roldán-Villalobos R
Histol Histopathol; 1993 Jul; 8(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 8358155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative study of degrees of differentiation of endometrial cancer].
Szarvas Z
Morphol Igazsagugyi Orv Sz; 1980 Oct; 20(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 7266521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optically clear nuclei. An alteration of endometrial epithelium in the presence of trophoblast.
Mazur MT; Hendrickson MR; Kempson RL
Am J Surg Pathol; 1983 Jul; 7(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 6614307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrastructural study of glandular epithelium in adenomyosis in comparison with those of proliferative endometrium and well-differentiated endometrial cancer.
Hayata T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jul; 165(1):225-8. PubMed ID: 1853901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital morphometry of cytologic aspirate endometrial samples.
Mahovlić V; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Rajhvajn S; Juric D; Projić IS; Ilić-Forko J; Babić D; Skrablin-Kucić S; Bozikov J
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 20437635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
