These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22062050)

  • 1. The estimated accuracy of the EU reference dissection method for pig carcass classification.
    Nissen PM; Busk H; Oksama M; Seynaeve M; Gispert M; Walstra P; Hansson I; Olsen E
    Meat Sci; 2006 May; 73(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 22062050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual dissection of pig carcasses.
    Vester-Christensen M; Erbou SG; Hansen MF; Olsen EV; Christensen LB; Hviid M; Ersbøll BK; Larsen R
    Meat Sci; 2009 Apr; 81(4):699-704. PubMed ID: 20416568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Collewet G; Bogner P; Allen P; Busk H; Dobrowolski A; Olsen E; Davenel A
    Meat Sci; 2005 Aug; 70(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 22063881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different devices for predicting the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses.
    Font I Furnols M; Gispert M
    Meat Sci; 2009 Nov; 83(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 20416687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of computed tomography and manual dissection for calibration of devices for pig carcass classification - Evaluation of uncertainty.
    Olsen EV; Christensen LB; Nielsen DB
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jan; 123():35-44. PubMed ID: 27614178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in the carcass characteristics of commercial british sheep with particular reference to overfatness.
    Kempster AJ
    Meat Sci; 1979 Jul; 3(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 22055348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On-line measurements in pig carcass classification: Repeatability and variation caused by the operator and the copy of instrument.
    Olsen EV; Candek-Potokar M; Oksama M; Kien S; Lisiak D; Busk H
    Meat Sci; 2007 Jan; 75(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 22063408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the EUROP system for lamb classification in Norway; repeatability and accuracy of visual assessment and prediction of lamb carcass composition.
    Johansen J; Aastveit AH; Egelandsdal B; Kvaal K; Røe M
    Meat Sci; 2006 Nov; 74(3):497-509. PubMed ID: 22063054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pig carcass classification in the 65-190 kilogram range using the Danish fat-o-meat'er.
    Chizzolini R; Badiani A; Bettati T; Morini S; Barchi D; Malagoli G
    Meat Sci; 1988; 22(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 22055150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Carcass characteristics of suckling lambs protected by the PGI "Lechazo de Castilla y León" European quality label: Effect of breed, sex and carcass weight.
    Miguélez E; Zumalacárregui JM; Osorio MT; Beteta O; Mateo J
    Meat Sci; 2006 May; 73(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 22062057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of the weight of lean and fat yield in bacon weight carcasses. A comparison of predictors used in commercial pig carcass classification.
    Giles LR; Ryan PJ; Watchman DK; Belinda Dettmann E
    Meat Sci; 1983 Jan; 8(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 22055403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental changes of carcass composition, meat quality and organs in the Jinhua pig and Landrace.
    Miao ZG; Wang LJ; Xu ZR; Huang JF; Wang YR
    Animal; 2009 Mar; 3(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 22444318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting beef carcass meat, fat and bone proportions from carcass conformation and fat scores or hindquarter dissection.
    Conroy SB; Drennan MJ; McGee M; Keane MG; Kenny DA; Berry DP
    Animal; 2010 Feb; 4(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 22443877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationships between chemical composition and physically separated tissues of the pig carcass.
    Smith WC; Pearson G
    Meat Sci; 1985; 14(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22055779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lean content prediction in pig carcasses, loin and ham by computed tomography (CT) using a density model.
    Picouet PA; Teran F; Gispert M; Font i Furnols M
    Meat Sci; 2010 Nov; 86(3):616-22. PubMed ID: 20656413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The accuracy of predicting carcass composition of three different pig genetic lines by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Marcoux M; Faucitano L; Pomar C
    Meat Sci; 2005 Aug; 70(4):655-63. PubMed ID: 22063893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of carcass composition by impedance spectroscopy in lambs of similar weight.
    Altmann M; Pliquett U; Suess R; Borell Ev
    Meat Sci; 2005 Jun; 70(2):319-27. PubMed ID: 22063489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships between carcass quality parameters and genetic types.
    Gispert M; Font I Furnols M; Gil M; Velarde A; Diestre A; Carrión D; Sosnicki AA; Plastow GS
    Meat Sci; 2007 Nov; 77(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 22061793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Growth of carcass components and its relation with conformation in pigs of three types.
    Fisher AV; Green DM; Whittemore CT; Wood JD; Schofield CP
    Meat Sci; 2003 Sep; 65(1):639-50. PubMed ID: 22063259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.