These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22062514)

  • 1. A novel approach to grading pork carcasses: computer vision and ultrasound.
    Fortin A; Tong AK; Robertson WM; Zawadski SM; Landry SJ; Robinson DJ; Liu T; Mockford RJ
    Meat Sci; 2003 Apr; 63(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 22062514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of an advanced automated ultrasonic scanner (AutoFom III) and a handheld optical probe (Destron PG-100) to determine lean yield in pork carcasses.
    Dorleku JB; Wormsbecher L; Christensen M; Campbell CP; Mandell IB; Bohrer BM
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36807699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An update of the predicted lean yield equation for the Destron PG-100 optical grading probe.
    Bohrer BM; Wang Y; Dorleku JB; Campbell CP; Mandell IB
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37317891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of variability in pork carcass composition and quality between barrows and gilts.
    Overholt MF; Arkfeld EK; Mohrhauser DA; King DA; Wheeler TL; Dilger AC; Shackelford SD; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4415-4426. PubMed ID: 27898864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pork carcass grading: A comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater.
    Fortin A; Jones SD; Haworth CR
    Meat Sci; 1984; 10(2):131-44. PubMed ID: 22056064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the prediction of alternative measures of pork carcass composition by three optical probes.
    Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):767-94. PubMed ID: 19820040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of three ultrasound instruments, CVT-2, UltraFom 300 and AutoFom for predicting salable meat yield and weight of lean in the primals of pork carcasses.
    Fortin A; Tong AK; Robertson WM
    Meat Sci; 2004 Dec; 68(4):537-49. PubMed ID: 22062530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of carcass weight, fat depth measures and eye muscle area for predicting the percentage yield of saleable meat in Australian grass-fed beef carcasses for Japan.
    Hopkins DL; Roberts AH
    Meat Sci; 1995; 41(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 22060164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of electronic grading probes for the objective assessment of PSE and DFD in pork carcasses.
    Fortin A; Raymond DP
    Meat Sci; 1987; 21(3):159-73. PubMed ID: 22054895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pork carcass evaluation with an automated and computerized ultrasonic system.
    Liu Y; Stouffer JR
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Jan; 73(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 7601745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses.
    Johnson RK; Berg EP; Goodwin R; Mabry JW; Miller RK; Robison OW; Sellers H; Tokach MD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2428-41. PubMed ID: 15318744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina.
    Goenaga P; Lloveras MR; Améndola C
    Meat Sci; 2008 Jul; 79(3):611-3. PubMed ID: 22062924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship of pork carcass weight and leanness parameters in the Ontario commercial pork industry.
    Barducci RS; Zhou ZY; Wormsbecher L; Roehrig C; Tulpan D; Bohrer BM
    Transl Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 4(1):331-338. PubMed ID: 32704993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of saleable meat yield using objective measurements captured by video image analysis technology.
    McEvers TJ; Hutcheson JP; Lawrence TE
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Sep; 90(9):3294-300. PubMed ID: 22966082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On-line pork carcass grading with the Autofom ultrasound system.
    Brøndum J; Egebo M; Agerskov C; Busk H
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jul; 76(7):1859-68. PubMed ID: 9690641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of transverse and longitudinal real-time ultrasound scans for prediction of lean cut yields and fat-free lean content in live pigs.
    Cisneros F; Ellis M; Miller KD; Novakofski J; Wilson ER; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2566-76. PubMed ID: 8923171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carcass traits, cut yields, and compositional end points in high-lean-yielding pork carcasses: effects of 10th rib backfat and loin eye area.
    Pringle TD; Williams SE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 11204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.