128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22062640)
1. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production.
Dransfield E; Ngapo TM; Nielsen NA; Bredahl L; Sjödén PO; Magnusson M; Campo MM; Nute GR
Meat Sci; 2005 Jan; 69(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 22062640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of meat appearance on consumer preferences for pork chops in Greece and Cyprus.
Fortomaris P; Arsenos G; Georgiadis M; Banos G; Stamataris C; Zygoyiannis D
Meat Sci; 2006 Apr; 72(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 22061881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consumers' perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled 'raised without antibiotics'.
Bradford H; McKernan C; Elliott C; Dean M
Appetite; 2022 Apr; 171():105900. PubMed ID: 34968563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of intrinsic search cues in the formation of consumer preferences and choice for pork chops.
Verbeke W; De Smet S; Vackier I; Van Oeckel MJ; Warnants N; Van Kenhove P
Meat Sci; 2005 Feb; 69(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 22062827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consumers' Preference for the Consumption of the Fresh Black Slavonian Pig's Meat.
Jelić Milković S; Lončarić R; Kralik I; Kristić J; Crnčan A; Djurkin Kušec I; Canavari M
Foods; 2023 Mar; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 36981181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of sensory quality of pork on consumer preference.
Aaslyng MD; Oksama M; Olsen EV; Bejerholm C; Baltzer M; Andersen G; Bredie WL; Byrne DV; Gabrielsen G
Meat Sci; 2007 May; 76(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 22064192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer preferences for reduced antibiotic use in Danish pig production.
Denver S; Jensen JD; Christensen T
Prev Vet Med; 2021 Apr; 189():105310. PubMed ID: 33667759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumer choice of pork chops in Taiwan.
Chen MT; Guo HL; Tseng TF; Roan SW; Ngapo TM
Meat Sci; 2010 Jul; 85(3):555-9. PubMed ID: 20416840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there a potential international market for Danish welfare pork? - A consumer survey from Denmark, Sweden, and Germany.
Denver S; Christensen T; Nordström J; Lund TB; Sandøe P
Meat Sci; 2022 Jan; 183():108616. PubMed ID: 34481232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.
Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG
Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consumer satisfaction with pork meat and derived products in five European countries.
Resano H; Perez-Cueto FJ; de Barcellos MD; Veflen-Olsen N; Grunert KG; Verbeke W
Appetite; 2011 Feb; 56(1):167-70. PubMed ID: 21029759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries.
Lin-Schilstra L; Backus G; Snoek H; Mörlein D
Meat Sci; 2022 May; 187():108736. PubMed ID: 35123247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers.
Oliver MA; Nute GR; Font I Furnols M; San Julián R; Campo MM; Sañudo C; Cañeque V; Guerrero L; Alvarez I; Díaz MT; Branscheid W; Wicke M; Montossi F
Meat Sci; 2006 Nov; 74(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 22063047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yogurt.
Napolitano F; Pacelli C; Girolami A; Braghieri A
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Mar; 91(3):910-7. PubMed ID: 18292246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The United States pork niche market phenomenon.
Honeyman MS; Pirog RS; Huber GH; Lammers PJ; Hermann JR
J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2269-75. PubMed ID: 16864889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do pig farmers preferences bias consumer choice for pork? Response to critique of the pork preference studies.
Ngapo TM; Fortin J; Martin JF
Meat Sci; 2010 Aug; 85(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 20416804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Willingness to Pay a Higher Price for Pork Obtained Using Animal-Friendly Raising Techniques: A Consumers' Opinion Survey.
Giannetto C; Biondi V; Previti A; De Pascale A; Monti S; Alibrandi A; Zirilli A; Lanfranchi M; Pugliese M; Passantino A
Foods; 2023 Nov; 12(23):. PubMed ID: 38231599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer response to the possible use of a vaccine method to control boar taint v. physical piglet castration with anaesthesia: a quantitative study in four European countries.
Vanhonacker F; Verbeke W
Animal; 2011 May; 5(7):1107-18. PubMed ID: 22440106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consumer preferences for pig welfare - Can the market accommodate more than one level of welfare pork?
Denver S; Sandøe P; Christensen T
Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():140-146. PubMed ID: 28284125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
