These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22062640)

  • 21. Production systems and influence on eating quality of pork.
    Bonneau M; Lebret B
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 20374788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Credence cues of pork are more important than consumers' culinary skills to boost their purchasing intention.
    Argemí-Armengol I; Villalba D; Ripoll G; Teixeira A; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():11-21. PubMed ID: 30954794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consumer perceptions: pork and pig production. Insights from France, England, Sweden and Denmark.
    Ngapo TM; Dransfield E; Martin JF; Magnusson M; Bredahl L; Nute GR
    Meat Sci; 2004 Jan; 66(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 22063940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
    Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. S-shape relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay premium prices for high quality cured pork products in Spain.
    Cotes-Torres A; Muñoz-Gallego PA; Cotes-Torres JM
    Meat Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):814-8. PubMed ID: 22118984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs.
    Lebret B
    Animal; 2008 Oct; 2(10):1548-58. PubMed ID: 22443914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do all the consumers accept marbling in the same way? The relationship between eating and visual acceptability of pork with different intramuscular fat content.
    Font-i-Furnols M; Tous N; Esteve-Garcia E; Gispert M
    Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 22429803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scandinavian consumer preference for beef steaks packed with or without oxygen.
    Aaslyng MD; Tørngren MA; Madsen NT
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jul; 85(3):519-24. PubMed ID: 20416824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.
    Martínez Michel L; Anders S; Wismer WV
    J Food Sci; 2011 Oct; 76(8):S469-77. PubMed ID: 22417604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of organic pig production systems on performance and meat quality.
    Hansen LL; Claudi-Magnussen C; Jensen SK; Andersen HJ
    Meat Sci; 2006 Dec; 74(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 22063213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consumer preferences for pork chops in five Canadian provinces.
    Ngapo TM
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():102-110. PubMed ID: 28268205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Which product characteristics are preferred by Chinese consumers when choosing pork? A conjoint analysis on perceived quality of selected pork attributes.
    Ma XQ; Verkuil JM; Reinbach HC; Meinert L
    Food Sci Nutr; 2017 May; 5(3):770-775. PubMed ID: 28572967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acceptability of lamb meat from different producing systems and ageing time to German, Spanish and British consumers.
    Font I Furnols M; Julián RS; Guerrero L; Sañudo C; Campo MM; Olleta JL; Oliver MA; Cañeque V; Alvarez I; Díaz MT; Branscheid W; Wicke M; Nute GR; Montossi F
    Meat Sci; 2006 Mar; 72(3):545-54. PubMed ID: 22061739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Pork choice.
    Ngapo TM; Rubio Lozano MS; Braña Varela D
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():27-35. PubMed ID: 28863351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consumers' purchase of organic food products. A matter of convenience and reflexive practices.
    Hjelmar U
    Appetite; 2011 Apr; 56(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 21192997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does an energy efficiency label alter consumers' purchasing decisions? A latent class approach based on a stated choice experiment in Shanghai.
    Shen J; Saijo T
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3561-73. PubMed ID: 19595499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors affecting consumers' preferences for and purchasing decisions regarding pasteurized and raw milk specialty cheeses.
    Colonna A; Durham C; Meunier-Goddik L
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Oct; 94(10):5217-26. PubMed ID: 21943772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Duroc content, sex and ageing period on meat and eating quality attributes of pork loin.
    Channon HA; Kerr MG; Walker PJ
    Meat Sci; 2004 Apr; 66(4):881-8. PubMed ID: 22061021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regional variation in the hedonic evaluation of lamb meat from diverse production systems by consumers in six European countries.
    Sañudo C; Alfonso M; San Julián R; Thorkelsson G; Valdimarsdottir T; Zygoyiannis D; Stamataris C; Piasentier E; Mills C; Berge P; Dransfield E; Nute GR; Enser M; Fisher AV
    Meat Sci; 2007 Apr; 75(4):610-21. PubMed ID: 22064025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops.
    Rincker PJ; Killefer J; Ellis M; Brewer MS; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):730-7. PubMed ID: 18156359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.