86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22062924)
1. Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina.
Goenaga P; Lloveras MR; Améndola C
Meat Sci; 2008 Jul; 79(3):611-3. PubMed ID: 22062924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pork carcass grading: A comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater.
Fortin A; Jones SD; Haworth CR
Meat Sci; 1984; 10(2):131-44. PubMed ID: 22056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses.
Johnson RK; Berg EP; Goodwin R; Mabry JW; Miller RK; Robison OW; Sellers H; Tokach MD
J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2428-41. PubMed ID: 15318744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the prediction of alternative measures of pork carcass composition by three optical probes.
Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):767-94. PubMed ID: 19820040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield.
McClure EK; Scanga JA; Belk KE; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 12772846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes.
Kempster AJ; Chadwick JP; Cue RI; Grantley-Smith M
Meat Sci; 1986; 16(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 22054831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lean meat prediction with HGP, CGM and CSB-Image-Meater, with prediction accuracy evaluated for different proportions of gilts, boars and castrated boars in the pig population.
Engel B; Lambooij E; Buist WG; Vereijken P
Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 21871739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the Danish MFA, Ulster and optical probes for use in pig carcass classification and grading.
Kempster AJ; Jones DW; Cuthbertson A
Meat Sci; 1979 Apr; 3(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 22055266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of the Hennessy Grading Probe (GP) for predicting the meat, fat and bone yields of beef carcasses.
Kirton AH; Feist CL; Duganzich DM; Jordan RB; O'Donnell KP; Woods EG
Meat Sci; 1987; 20(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 22056119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting cutability of pork carcasses and hams using the Hennessy and Chong Fat Depth Indicator.
Kutsky JA; Savell JW; Johnson DD; Smith GC; Murphey CE; Cross HR; Weatherspoon L
Meat Sci; 1984; 11(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22054683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of dietary lysine restriction during the finishing period on growth performance and carcass, meat, and fat characteristics of barrows and gilts intended for dry-cured ham production.
Rodríguez-Sánchez JA; Sanz MA; Blanco M; Serrano MP; Joy M; Latorre MA
J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3651-62. PubMed ID: 21642490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the optical intrascope, the Hennessy & Chong Fat Depth Indicator and the Danish MFA probe to predict pig carcass backfat thickness.
Giles LR
Meat Sci; 1983 Jan; 8(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 22055404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of predicting carcass composition of three different pig genetic lines by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Marcoux M; Faucitano L; Pomar C
Meat Sci; 2005 Aug; 70(4):655-63. PubMed ID: 22063893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of electronic grading probes for the objective assessment of PSE and DFD in pork carcasses.
Fortin A; Raymond DP
Meat Sci; 1987; 21(3):159-73. PubMed ID: 22054895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships between chemical composition and physically separated tissues of the pig carcass.
Smith WC; Pearson G
Meat Sci; 1985; 14(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22055779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual X-ray absorptiometry accurately predicts carcass composition from live sheep and chemical composition of live and dead sheep.
Pearce KL; Ferguson M; Gardner G; Smith N; Greef J; Pethick DW
Meat Sci; 2009 Jan; 81(1):285-93. PubMed ID: 22063997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting beef carcass meat, fat and bone proportions from carcass conformation and fat scores or hindquarter dissection.
Conroy SB; Drennan MJ; McGee M; Keane MG; Kenny DA; Berry DP
Animal; 2010 Feb; 4(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 22443877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses using magnetic resonance imaging.
Collewet G; Bogner P; Allen P; Busk H; Dobrowolski A; Olsen E; Davenel A
Meat Sci; 2005 Aug; 70(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 22063881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
