These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22062928)

  • 1. Image texture features as indicators of beef tenderness.
    Li J; Tan J; Martz FA; Heymann H
    Meat Sci; 1999 Sep; 53(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22062928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of tough and tender beef by image texture analysis.
    Li J; Tan J; Shatadal P
    Meat Sci; 2001 Apr; 57(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 22061705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of USDA instrument-based marbling measurements for categorizing beef carcasses according to differences in longissimus muscle sensory attributes.
    Emerson MR; Woerner DR; Belk KE; Tatum JD
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Feb; 91(2):1024-34. PubMed ID: 23148250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beef customer satisfaction: trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values.
    Lorenzen CL; Miller RK; Taylors JF; Neely TR; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Buyek MJ; Reagan JO; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 12597384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implant strategies during feeding: impact on carcass grades and consumer acceptability.
    Roeber DL; Cannell RC; Belk KE; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jul; 78(7):1867-74. PubMed ID: 10907829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tenderness of beef loin steaks as influenced by marbling level, removal of subcutaneous fat, and cooking method.
    Berry BW
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Sep; 71(9):2412-9. PubMed ID: 8407653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling of Ethiopian Beef Meat Marbling Score Using Image Processing for Rapid Meat Grading.
    Erena T; Belay A; Hailu D; Asefa BG; Geleta M; Deme T
    J Imaging; 2024 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 38921607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Tendertec beef grading instrument to predict the tenderness of steaks from beef carcasses.
    Belk KE; George MH; Tatum JD; Hilton GG; Miller RK; Koohmaraie M; Reagan JO; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Mar; 79(3):688-97. PubMed ID: 11263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting beef tenderness using color and multispectral image texture features.
    Sun X; Chen KJ; Maddock-Carlin KR; Anderson VL; Lepper AN; Schwartz CA; Keller WL; Ilse BR; Magolski JD; Berg EP
    Meat Sci; 2012 Dec; 92(4):386-93. PubMed ID: 22647652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An audit of retail beef loin steak tenderness conducted in eight U.S. cities.
    George MH; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Jul; 77(7):1735-41. PubMed ID: 10438019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of forage level in feedlot finishing diets on carcass characteristics and palatability of Jersey beef.
    Arnett EJ; Fluharty FL; Loerch SC; Zerby HN; Zinn RA; Kuber PS
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):960-72. PubMed ID: 21965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of packaging atmospheres on beef instrumental tenderness, fresh color stability, and internal cooked color.
    Grobbel JP; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Milliken GA
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1191-9. PubMed ID: 18245502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of United States Department of Agriculture carcass maturity on sensory attributes of steaks produced by cattle representing two dental age classes.
    Semler ML; Woerner DR; Belk KE; Enns KJ; Tatum JD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):2207-17. PubMed ID: 27285716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of troponin-T degradation using color image texture features in 10d aged beef longissimus steaks.
    Sun X; Chen KJ; Berg EP; Newman DJ; Schwartz CA; Keller WL; Maddock Carlin KR
    Meat Sci; 2014 Feb; 96(2 Pt A):837-42. PubMed ID: 24200578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of growth implants on consumer perceptions of meat tenderness in beef steers.
    Barham BL; Brooks JC; Blanton JR; Herring AD; Carr MA; Kerth CR; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):3052-6. PubMed ID: 14677861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video image analysis as a potential grading system for Uruguayan beef carcasses.
    Vote DJ; Bowling MB; Cunha BC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Montossi F; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2376-90. PubMed ID: 19395512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of different packaging atmospheres and injection-enhancement on beef tenderness, sensory attributes, desmin degradation, and display color.
    Grobbel JP; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Milliken GA
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2697-710. PubMed ID: 18502880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of USDA carcass maturity on sensory attributes of beef produced by grain-finished steers and heifers classified as less than 30 months old using dentition.
    Acheson RJ; Woerner DR; Tatum JD
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1792-9. PubMed ID: 24663159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of beef eating quality from colour, marbling and wavelet texture features.
    Jackman P; Sun DW; Du CJ; Allen P; Downey G
    Meat Sci; 2008 Dec; 80(4):1273-81. PubMed ID: 22063868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical probes can predict tenderness of cooked beef longissimus using uncooked measurements.
    Stephens JW; Unruh JA; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Lawrence TE; Loughin TM
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):2077-86. PubMed ID: 15309955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.