BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22063178)

  • 1. Meat quality assessment using biophysical methods related to meat structure.
    Damez JL; Clerjon S
    Meat Sci; 2008 Sep; 80(1):132-49. PubMed ID: 22063178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying and predicting meat and meat products quality attributes using electromagnetic waves: an overview.
    Damez JL; Clerjon S
    Meat Sci; 2013 Dec; 95(4):879-96. PubMed ID: 23688798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict meat and meat products quality: A review.
    Prieto N; Roehe R; Lavín P; Batten G; Andrés S
    Meat Sci; 2009 Oct; 83(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 20416766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eating quality of commercially processed hot boned sheep meat.
    Toohey ES; Hopkins DL
    Meat Sci; 2006 Apr; 72(4):660-5. PubMed ID: 22061877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs.
    Lebret B
    Animal; 2008 Oct; 2(10):1548-58. PubMed ID: 22443914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meat quality characteristics of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis). 4: Sensory meat evaluation as influenced by age, gender and production region.
    Hoffman LC; Kroucamp M; Manley M
    Meat Sci; 2007 Aug; 76(4):774-8. PubMed ID: 22061257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent methods for predicting quality of whole meat.
    Monin G
    Meat Sci; 1998; 49S1():S231-43. PubMed ID: 22060714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of grazing and dietary protein on eating quality of Podolian beef.
    Marino R; Albenzio M; Caroprese M; Napolitano F; Santillo A; Braghieri A
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3752-8. PubMed ID: 21705638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On-line application of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict chemical-physical and sensory characteristics of beef quality.
    Prieto N; Ross DW; Navajas EA; Nute GR; Richardson RI; Hyslop JJ; Simm G; Roehe R
    Meat Sci; 2009 Sep; 83(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 20416617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ASAS Centennial paper: a century of pioneers and progress in meat science in the United States leads to new frontiers.
    Beermann DH
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):1192-8. PubMed ID: 19066248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meat quality of Nguni, Bonsmara and Aberdeen Angus steers raised on natural pasture in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.
    Muchenje V; Dzama K; Chimonyo M; Raats JG; Strydom PE
    Meat Sci; 2008 May; 79(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 22062594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of relationships between mineral concentration and fatty acid composition of longissimus muscle and beef palatability traits.
    Garmyn AJ; Hilton GG; Mateescu RG; Morgan JB; Reecy JM; Tait RG; Beitz DC; Duan Q; Schoonmaker JP; Mayes MS; Drewnoski ME; Liu Q; VanOverbeke DL
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(9):2849-58. PubMed ID: 21512113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional proteomic analysis predicts beef tenderness and the tenderness differential.
    Zapata I; Zerby HN; Wick M
    J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Jun; 57(11):4956-63. PubMed ID: 19449808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of exhaustion and electrical stimulation on the meat quality of young bulls: Part 2-Physical and sensory properties.
    Fjelkner-Modig S; Rudérus H
    Meat Sci; 1983 Apr; 8(3):203-20. PubMed ID: 22055560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carcass measurements and meat quality characteristics of dairy suckling kids compared to an indigenous genotype.
    Ekiz B; Ozcan M; Yilmaz A; Tölü C; Savaş T
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 20374893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative trait locus mapping in an F2 Duroc x Pietrain resource population: II. Carcass and meat quality traits.
    Edwards DB; Ernst CW; Raney NE; Doumit ME; Hoge MD; Bates RO
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):254-66. PubMed ID: 17965326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship of physiological maturity and marbling judged according to Korean grading system to meat quality traits of Hanwoo beef females.
    Moon SS; Yang HS; Park GB; Joo ST
    Meat Sci; 2006 Nov; 74(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 22063056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of vacuum or high-oxygen modified atmosphere packaging on quality of beef M. longissimus dorsi steaks after different ageing times.
    Lagerstedt Å; Lundström K; Lindahl G
    Meat Sci; 2011 Feb; 87(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 20934260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits and their relationships to liveweight and wool production in hogget Merino rams.
    Greeff JC; Safari E; Fogarty NM; Hopkins DL; Brien FD; Atkins KD; Mortimer SI; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Jun; 125(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 18479272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.