These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22063408)

  • 1. On-line measurements in pig carcass classification: Repeatability and variation caused by the operator and the copy of instrument.
    Olsen EV; Candek-Potokar M; Oksama M; Kien S; Lisiak D; Busk H
    Meat Sci; 2007 Jan; 75(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 22063408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The estimated accuracy of the EU reference dissection method for pig carcass classification.
    Nissen PM; Busk H; Oksama M; Seynaeve M; Gispert M; Walstra P; Hansson I; Olsen E
    Meat Sci; 2006 May; 73(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 22062050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of three ultrasound instruments, CVT-2, UltraFom 300 and AutoFom for predicting salable meat yield and weight of lean in the primals of pork carcasses.
    Fortin A; Tong AK; Robertson WM
    Meat Sci; 2004 Dec; 68(4):537-49. PubMed ID: 22062530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pork carcass grading: A comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater.
    Fortin A; Jones SD; Haworth CR
    Meat Sci; 1984; 10(2):131-44. PubMed ID: 22056064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the optical intrascope, the Hennessy & Chong Fat Depth Indicator and the Danish MFA probe to predict pig carcass backfat thickness.
    Giles LR
    Meat Sci; 1983 Jan; 8(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 22055404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes.
    Kempster AJ; Chadwick JP; Cue RI; Grantley-Smith M
    Meat Sci; 1986; 16(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 22054831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phenotypic measurements and various indices of lean and fat tissue development in barrows and gilts of two genetic lines from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight.
    Wiseman TG; Mahan DC; Moeller SJ; Peters JC; Fastinger ND; Ching S; Kim YY
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1816-24. PubMed ID: 17400970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship of live animal muscular and skeletal scores, ultrasound measurements and carcass classification scores with carcass composition and value in steers.
    Conroy SB; Drennan MJ; Kenny DA; McGee M
    Animal; 2009 Nov; 3(11):1613-24. PubMed ID: 22444995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the EUROP system for lamb classification in Norway; repeatability and accuracy of visual assessment and prediction of lamb carcass composition.
    Johansen J; Aastveit AH; Egelandsdal B; Kvaal K; Røe M
    Meat Sci; 2006 Nov; 74(3):497-509. PubMed ID: 22063054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the Danish MFA, Ulster and optical probes for use in pig carcass classification and grading.
    Kempster AJ; Jones DW; Cuthbertson A
    Meat Sci; 1979 Apr; 3(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 22055266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of the weight of lean and fat yield in bacon weight carcasses. A comparison of predictors used in commercial pig carcass classification.
    Giles LR; Ryan PJ; Watchman DK; Belinda Dettmann E
    Meat Sci; 1983 Jan; 8(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 22055403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigations into the GDF8 g+6723G-A polymorphism in New Zealand Texel sheep.
    Johnson PL; Dodds KG; Bain WE; Greer GJ; McLean NJ; McLaren RJ; Galloway SM; van Stijn TC; McEwan JC
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1856-64. PubMed ID: 19251921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishing an appropriate mode of comparison for measuring the performance of marbling score output from video image analysis beef carcass grading systems.
    Moore CB; Bass PD; Green MD; Chapman PL; O'Connor ME; Yates LD; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC; Belk KE
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2464-75. PubMed ID: 20348376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Collewet G; Bogner P; Allen P; Busk H; Dobrowolski A; Olsen E; Davenel A
    Meat Sci; 2005 Aug; 70(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 22063881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina.
    Goenaga P; Lloveras MR; Améndola C
    Meat Sci; 2008 Jul; 79(3):611-3. PubMed ID: 22062924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements.
    Tothill P; Avenell A; Love J; Reid DM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Nov; 48(11):781-94. PubMed ID: 7859696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships between bacon grade schedules and carcass characteristics.
    Kempster AJ; Monk AS
    Meat Sci; 1986; 17(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 22055142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lean meat prediction with HGP, CGM and CSB-Image-Meater, with prediction accuracy evaluated for different proportions of gilts, boars and castrated boars in the pig population.
    Engel B; Lambooij E; Buist WG; Vereijken P
    Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 21871739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Chinese breeds on pork quality of commercial pig lines.
    Cesar AS; Silveira AC; Freitas PF; Guimarães EC; Batista DF; Torido LC; Meirelles FV; Antunes RC
    Genet Mol Res; 2010 Apr; 9(2):727-33. PubMed ID: 20449804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.