These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22063416)

  • 1. The relationship between different pork carcass lean yield definitions and the market carcass value.
    Marcoux M; Pomar C; Faucitano L; Brodeur C
    Meat Sci; 2007 Jan; 75(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 22063416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of an advanced automated ultrasonic scanner (AutoFom III) and a handheld optical probe (Destron PG-100) to determine lean yield in pork carcasses.
    Dorleku JB; Wormsbecher L; Christensen M; Campbell CP; Mandell IB; Bohrer BM
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36807699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An update of the predicted lean yield equation for the Destron PG-100 optical grading probe.
    Bohrer BM; Wang Y; Dorleku JB; Campbell CP; Mandell IB
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37317891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship of pork carcass weight and leanness parameters in the Ontario commercial pork industry.
    Barducci RS; Zhou ZY; Wormsbecher L; Roehrig C; Tulpan D; Bohrer BM
    Transl Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 4(1):331-338. PubMed ID: 32704993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the prediction of alternative measures of pork carcass composition by three optical probes.
    Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):767-94. PubMed ID: 19820040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of carcass characteristics, carcass cutting yields, and meat quality of barrows and gilts.
    Bohrer BM; Dorleku JB; Campbell CP; Duarte MS; Mandell IB
    Transl Anim Sci; 2023; 7(1):txad079. PubMed ID: 37649648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Video image analysis as a potential grading system for Uruguayan beef carcasses.
    Vote DJ; Bowling MB; Cunha BC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Montossi F; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2376-90. PubMed ID: 19395512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between conformation and the yield and distribution of lean meat in the carcasses of British pigs, cattle and sheep: A review.
    Kempster AJ; Cuthbertson A; Harrington G
    Meat Sci; 1982 Jan; 6(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 22054705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina.
    Goenaga P; Lloveras MR; Améndola C
    Meat Sci; 2008 Jul; 79(3):611-3. PubMed ID: 22062924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual X-ray absorptiometry accurately predicts carcass composition from live sheep and chemical composition of live and dead sheep.
    Pearce KL; Ferguson M; Gardner G; Smith N; Greef J; Pethick DW
    Meat Sci; 2009 Jan; 81(1):285-93. PubMed ID: 22063997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A summary review of carcass cutability data comparing primal value of immunologically and physically castrated barrows.
    Harsh BN; Cowles B; Johnson RC; Pollmann DS; Schroeder AL; Dilger AC; Boler DD
    Transl Anim Sci; 2017 Feb; 1(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 32704631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pork carcass grading: A comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater.
    Fortin A; Jones SD; Haworth CR
    Meat Sci; 1984; 10(2):131-44. PubMed ID: 22056064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the weight of lean meat in lamb carcasses and the suitability of this characteristic as a basis for valuing carcasses.
    Hopkins DL
    Meat Sci; 1994; 38(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 22059661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carcass composition and meat quality differences between pasture-reared ewe and ram lambs.
    Johnson PL; Purchas RW; McEwan JC; Blair HT
    Meat Sci; 2005 Oct; 71(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 22064240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VIII): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.
    Wheeler TL; Cundiff LV; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Sep; 88(9):3070-83. PubMed ID: 20453085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. USDA yield grades and various carcass traits as predictors of carcass composition.
    Lunt DK; Smith GC; Savell JW; Murphey CE; Carpenter ZL; McKeith FK; Johnson DD
    Meat Sci; 1985; 14(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 22055934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colour differences among carcasses graded with similar score for conformation and fatness.
    Indurain G; Goñi V; Horcada A; Insausti K; Hernández B; Beriain MJ
    Animal; 2008 Jul; 2(7):1093-100. PubMed ID: 22443711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Collewet G; Bogner P; Allen P; Busk H; Dobrowolski A; Olsen E; Davenel A
    Meat Sci; 2005 Aug; 70(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 22063881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ability of video image analysis to predict lean meat yield and EUROP score of lamb carcasses.
    Einarsson E; Eythórsdóttir E; Smith CR; Jónmundsson JV
    Animal; 2014 Jul; 8(7):1170-7. PubMed ID: 24807642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.