These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22063997)

  • 41. Predicting the weight of lean meat in lamb carcasses and the suitability of this characteristic as a basis for valuing carcasses.
    Hopkins DL
    Meat Sci; 1994; 38(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 22059661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina.
    Goenaga P; Lloveras MR; Améndola C
    Meat Sci; 2008 Jul; 79(3):611-3. PubMed ID: 22062924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Composition analysis of beef rib sections by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Mitchell AD; Solomon MB; Rumsey TS
    Meat Sci; 1997 Sep; 47(1-2):115-24. PubMed ID: 22062622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship of pork carcass weight and leanness parameters in the Ontario commercial pork industry.
    Barducci RS; Zhou ZY; Wormsbecher L; Roehrig C; Tulpan D; Bohrer BM
    Transl Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 4(1):331-338. PubMed ID: 32704993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prediction of the weight of lean and fat yield in bacon weight carcasses. A comparison of predictors used in commercial pig carcass classification.
    Giles LR; Ryan PJ; Watchman DK; Belinda Dettmann E
    Meat Sci; 1983 Jan; 8(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 22055403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relationships between chemical composition and physically separated tissues of the pig carcass.
    Smith WC; Pearson G
    Meat Sci; 1985; 14(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22055779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The relationship between body dimensions of living pigs and their carcass composition.
    Doeschl-Wilson AB; Green DM; Fisher AV; Carroll SM; Schofield CP; Whittemore CT
    Meat Sci; 2005 Jun; 70(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 22063479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Prediction of body composition of Iberian pigs by means bioelectrical impedance.
    Daza A; Mateos A; Ovejero I; Bote CJ
    Meat Sci; 2006 Jan; 72(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 22061372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Investigations into the accuracy of prediction of beef carcass composition using subcutaneous fat thickness and carcass weight II. Improving the accuracy of prediction.
    Johnson ER; Priyanto R; Taylor DG
    Meat Sci; 1997 Jun; 46(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 22062039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vivo measurement of body composition of chickens using quantitative magnetic resonance.
    Mitchell AD; Rosebrough RW; Taicher GZ; Kovner I
    Poult Sci; 2011 Aug; 90(8):1712-9. PubMed ID: 21753208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sheep carcass composition estimated from Longissimus thoracis et lumborum muscle volume measured by in vivo real-time ultrasonography.
    Silva SR; Guedes CM; Santos VA; Lourenço AL; Azevedo JM; Dias-da-Silva A
    Meat Sci; 2007 Aug; 76(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 22061248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. National estimates of the body composition of British cattle, sheep and pigs with special reference to trends in fatness. A review.
    Kempster AJ; Cook GL; Grantley-Smith M
    Meat Sci; 1986; 17(2):107-38. PubMed ID: 22055218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Estimation of lamb carcass composition from measurements of the speed of ultrasound in the soft tissues of live animals and carcasses.
    Miles CA; Fursey GA; Fisher AV; Page SJ
    Meat Sci; 1991; 30(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 22061973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Carcass and Primal Composition Predictions Using Camera Vision Systems (CVS) and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Technologies on Mature Cows.
    Segura J; Aalhus JL; Prieto N; Larsen IL; Juárez M; López-Campos Ó
    Foods; 2021 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 34070040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The relationship between different pork carcass lean yield definitions and the market carcass value.
    Marcoux M; Pomar C; Faucitano L; Brodeur C
    Meat Sci; 2007 Jan; 75(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 22063416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In vivo quantification of fat content in mice using the Hologic QDR 4500A densitometer.
    Senn SM; Kantor S; Leury BJ; Andrikopoulos S; O'Brien TJ; Morris MJ; Proietto J; Wark JD
    Obes Res Clin Pract; 2007 Jan; 1(1):1-78. PubMed ID: 24351433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Interrelationships amongst carcass and meat quality characteristics of sheep.
    Okeudo NJ; Moss BW
    Meat Sci; 2005 Jan; 69(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22062633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pork carcass grading: A comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater.
    Fortin A; Jones SD; Haworth CR
    Meat Sci; 1984; 10(2):131-44. PubMed ID: 22056064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The relationship of carcass measurements to carcass composition and intramuscular fat in Spanish beef.
    Indurain G; Carr TR; Goñi MV; Insausti K; Beriain MJ
    Meat Sci; 2009 Jun; 82(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 20416772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Non-invasive measure of body composition of snakes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Secor SM; Nagy TR
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol; 2003 Oct; 136(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 14511756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.