These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22066463)

  • 1. Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration margins.
    Dennison JB; Sarrett DC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Apr; 39(4):301-18. PubMed ID: 22066463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 12572649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports.
    Mjör IA; Toffenetti F
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 11203922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage and marginal hybrid layer formation of compomer restorations.
    Prati C; Nucci C; Toledano M; García-Godoy F; Breschi L; Chersoni S
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 14753330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations.
    Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):528-34. PubMed ID: 12216574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
    Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do adhesives prevent microleakage?
    Retief DH
    Int Dent J; 1994 Feb; 44(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 8021028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome.
    Heintze SD
    J Adhes Dent; 2007; 9 Suppl 1():77-106. PubMed ID: 18341236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sealing ability of new generation adhesive-restorative materials placed on vital teeth.
    Ferrari M; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2002 Apr; 15(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 12092990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Replacement and initial placement of tooth colored restorations: a review and discussion.
    Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 78(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9800555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
    Wadenya R; Mante FK
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
    Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of 4-META adhesive on bond strength and marginal seal of amalgam restorations and repairs--an in vitro study.
    George S; Kuriakose S; Jayalatha NS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 9522758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonding of amalgam to dentine: microleakage and shear bond strength evaluation.
    van der Vyver PJ; de Wet FA; Kearney WD; de Nysschen D
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Aug; 51(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 9461930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.