These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22066473)

  • 1. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part I: comparison of three direct methods.
    Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):539-44. PubMed ID: 22066473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part II: comparison of four acrylic resins.
    Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 22208886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Cardoso A; Rocha EP; Gomes EA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 18784525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A strain gauge analysis of microstrain induced by various splinting methods and acrylic resin types for implant impressions.
    Cerqueira NM; Ozcan M; Gonçalves M; da Rocha DM; Vasconcellos DK; Bottino MA; Yener-Salihoğlu E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 22442773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
    Cabral LM; Guedes CG
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Transfer Impression Techniques for Osseointegrated Implants.
    Zen BM; Soares EF; Rodrigues MA; Luthi LF; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):662-7. PubMed ID: 25438007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of splinting implant impression techniques: two dimensional analyses.
    Tarib NA; Seong TW; Chuen KM; Kun MS; Ahmad M; Kamarudin KH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 22474935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.
    Ongül D; Gökçen-Röhlig B; Şermet B; Keskin H
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Jun; 57(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 22624759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.