These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22067604)

  • 1. Surface edges mitigate the disparity gradient constraint on binocular fusion and visual direction.
    Marlow P
    Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 22067604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry.
    Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of surface placement and surface overlap on stereo slant contrast and enhancement.
    Gillam BJ; Pianta MJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3083-95. PubMed ID: 16112705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new look at binocular stereopsis.
    Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning.
    Tyler CW; Kontsevich LL
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociations between slant-contrast and reversed slant-contrast.
    Poom L; Olsson H; Börjesson E
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 17300825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia for blurred edges.
    Georgeson MA; Wallis SA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Mar; 34(2):163-85. PubMed ID: 24476421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grouping and segmentation in binocular rivalry.
    Silver MA; Logothetis NK
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1675-92. PubMed ID: 15136003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax.
    Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity.
    Ito H
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):931-42. PubMed ID: 15644231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry.
    Li DF; Freeman AW; Alais D
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 15733958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 15610751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binocular capture: the effects of spatial frequency and contrast polarity of the monocular target.
    Raghunandan A
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2369-77. PubMed ID: 21982870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.