These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22067808)

  • 1. A qualitative exploration of emergency contraception users' willingness to select the copper IUD.
    Wright RL; Frost CJ; Turok DK
    Contraception; 2012 Jan; 85(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 22067808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.
    Kaller S; Mays A; Freedman L; Harper CC; Biggs MA
    BMC Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 31992295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception.
    Ramanadhan S; Goldstuck N; Henderson JT; Che Y; Cleland K; Dodge LE; Edelman A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Feb; 2(2):CD013744. PubMed ID: 36847591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A survey of women obtaining emergency contraception: are they interested in using the copper IUD?
    Turok DK; Gurtcheff SE; Handley E; Simonsen SE; Sok C; North R; Frost C; Murphy PA
    Contraception; 2011 May; 83(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 21477687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.
    Turok DK; Sanders JN; Thompson IS; Royer PA; Eggebroten J; Gawron LM
    Contraception; 2016 Jun; 93(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 26944863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emergency contraception with a copper IUD or oral levonorgestrel: an observational study of 1-year pregnancy rates.
    Turok DK; Jacobson JC; Dermish AI; Simonsen SE; Gurtcheff S; McFadden M; Murphy PA
    Contraception; 2014 Mar; 89(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 24332433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge of and Interest in the Copper Intrauterine Device Among Women Seeking Emergency Contraception.
    Edwards C; Panjwani D; Pendrith C; Ly A; Dunn S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jan; 40(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 28780215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiences of Advanced Practitioners with Inserting the Copper Intrauterine Device as Emergency Contraception.
    Wright RL; Frost CJ; Turok DK
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 27264913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of effective contraception 6 months after emergency contraception with a copper intrauterine device or ulipristal acetate - a prospective observational cohort study.
    Envall N; Groes Kofoed N; Kopp-Kallner H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Aug; 95(8):887-93. PubMed ID: 27109900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptability of the copper intrauterine device as a form of emergency contraception in New South Wales, Australia.
    Dorney E; Botfield JR; Robertson S; McGeechan K; Bateson D
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2020 Apr; 25(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 32072848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception.
    Turok DK; Gero A; Simmons RG; Kaiser JE; Stoddard GJ; Sexsmith CD; Gawron LM; Sanders JN
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Jan; 384(4):335-344. PubMed ID: 33503342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emergency Contraception.
    Batur P; Kransdorf LN; Casey PM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2016 Jun; 91(6):802-7. PubMed ID: 27261868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Copper T380 intrauterine device for emergency contraception: highly effective at any time in the menstrual cycle.
    Turok DK; Godfrey EM; Wojdyla D; Dermish A; Torres L; Wu SC
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2672-6. PubMed ID: 23945595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. IUDs as EC? Limited awareness and high reported acceptability: evidence from Argentina.
    Pichardo M; Arribas L; Coccio E; Heredia G; Jagroep S; Palermo T
    Contraception; 2014 Nov; 90(5):522-8. PubMed ID: 24973905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.
    Harper CC; Speidel JJ; Drey EA; Trussell J; Blum M; Darney PD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 119(2 Pt 1):220-6. PubMed ID: 22270272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving uptake of the copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception by educating pharmacists in the community.
    Clement KM; Mansour DJ
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2014 Jan; 40(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 23645564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pilot study of the Copper T380A IUD and oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception.
    Turok DK; Gurtcheff SE; Handley E; Simonsen SE; Sok C; Murphy P
    Contraception; 2010 Dec; 82(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 21074014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond Plan B: A Qualitative Study of Canadian Pharmacists' Emergency Contraception Counselling Practices.
    Wong K; Hum S; McCarthy L; Dunn S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1021-1027. PubMed ID: 28757409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.