BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22067855)

  • 1. Use of stereolithographic drilling and cutting guides in bilateral mandibular distraction.
    Seeberger R; Davids R; Kater W; Thiele OC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2031-5. PubMed ID: 22067855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.
    Gateno J; Allen ME; Teichgraeber JF; Messersmith ML
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):985-90; discussion 990-1. PubMed ID: 10981978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of rapid prototyping in the preoperative planning of distraction osteogenesis of the cranio-maxillofacial skeleton.
    Poukens J; Haex J; Riediger D
    Comput Aided Surg; 2003; 8(3):146-54. PubMed ID: 15253367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of computer-aided 3D surgery and stereolithographic modelling for vector orientation in premaxillary and trans-sinusoidal maxillary distraction osteogenesis.
    Varol A; Basa S
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Jun; 5(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 19253904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
    Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation-guided navigation for vector control in pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Badiali G; Cutolo F; Roncari A; Marchetti C; Bianchi A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):969-980. PubMed ID: 28347627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distraction osteogenesis: a method to improve facial balance in asymmetric patients.
    Robiony M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):508-12. PubMed ID: 20216446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional virtual-surgery simulation-assisted asymmetric bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis for a patient with bilateral condylar fractures.
    Kim MJ; Seo J; Kim DK; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 28024774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular distraction combined with orthognathic techniques for the correction of severe adult mandibular hypoplasia.
    Yin L; Tang X; Shi L; Yin H; Zhang Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1947-52. PubMed ID: 25377953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of distraction vector transfer in unilateral vertical distraction of the mandibular ramus.
    Kofod T; Nørholt SE; Pedersen TK; Jensen J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 16(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15699640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distraction osteogenesis in a severe mandibular deficiency.
    Ortakoglu K; Karacay S; Sencimen M; Akin E; Ozyigit AH; Bengi O
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jan; 3():7. PubMed ID: 17239254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted surgery in therapeutic strategy distraction osteogenesis of hemifacial microsomia: Accuracy and predictability.
    Tan A; Chai Y; Mooi W; Chen X; Xu H; Zin MA; Lin L; Zhang Y; Yang X; Chai G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 47(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 30583926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereolithographic models for simulation and transfer of vector in vertical distraction of the mandibular ramus: a technical note.
    Kofod T; Pedersen TK; Nørholt SE; Jensen J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):608-14. PubMed ID: 16077305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous correction of bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis with mandibular micrognathia using internal distraction osteogenesis and 3-dimensional craniomaxillofacial models.
    Feiyun P; Wei L; Jun C; Xin X; Zhuojin S; Fengguo Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 68(3):571-7. PubMed ID: 19954874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-Assisted Distraction Osteogenesis in the Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia.
    Yu H; Wang B; Wang M; Wang X; Shen SG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 27(6):1539-42. PubMed ID: 27526230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of a CAD/CAM surgical template for mandibular distraction: a preliminary study.
    Li B; Sun H; Zeng F; Zhang T; Wang X
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 56(9):814-819. PubMed ID: 30293804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction in unilateral mandibular hypoplasia.
    Martínez Plaza A; Pérez de Perceval Tara M; Bullejos Martínez E; Marín Fernández AB; España López A; Fernández Valadés R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 58(5):564-570. PubMed ID: 32143936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of virtually planned mandibular distraction in a pediatric case series.
    Vanesa V; Irene MP; Marta AS; Francisco José PF; Miguel BS; Mireia RM; Josep RP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Feb; 49(2):154-165. PubMed ID: 33423894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data.
    Troulis MJ; Everett P; Seldin EB; Kikinis R; Kaban LB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Aug; 31(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 12361065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandibular deformities: single-vector distraction techniques for a multivector problem.
    Singh DJ; Glick PH; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1468-72. PubMed ID: 19816280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.