These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22068140)

  • 1. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives.
    Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP; Butcher M
    J Wound Care; 2011 Sep; 20(9):412, 414, 416-22. PubMed ID: 22068140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of adhesive dressing edges on cutaneous irritancy and skin barrier function.
    Dykes PJ
    J Wound Care; 2007 Mar; 16(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 17385583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin.
    Dykes PJ; Heggie R; Hill SA
    J Wound Care; 2001 Feb; 10(2):7-10. PubMed ID: 12964220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biophysical effects of repetitive removal of adhesive dressings on peri-ulcer skin.
    Zillmer R; Agren MS; Gottrup F; Karlsmark T
    J Wound Care; 2006 May; 15(5):187-91. PubMed ID: 16711170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The link between the peel force of adhesive dressings and subjective discomfort in volunteer subjects.
    Dykes PJ; Heggie R
    J Wound Care; 2003 Jul; 12(7):260-2. PubMed ID: 12894697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.
    Morris C; Emsley P; Marland E; Meuleneire F; White R
    Paediatr Nurs; 2009 Apr; 21(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 19397129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of concentration of tackifying agent on adhesive and skin-protective properties of ceramide 2-containing hydrocolloid dressings.
    Kohta M; Iwasaki T
    J Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 25543822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new methodology for evaluating the damage to the skin barrier caused by repeated application and removal of adhesive dressings.
    Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e366-74. PubMed ID: 22694144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of adhesive wound dressing and its effects on the stratum corneum of the skin: comparison of eight different adhesive wound dressings.
    Matsumura H; Imai R; Ahmatjan N; Ida Y; Gondo M; Shibata D; Wanatabe K
    Int Wound J; 2014 Feb; 11(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 22883604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Irritant Factors of Silicone and Hydrocolloid Skin Contact Adhesives Using Trans-Epidermal Water Loss, Protein Stripping, Erythema, and Ease of Removal.
    Dyson E; Sikkink S; Nocita D; Twigg P; Westgate G; Swift T
    ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2024 Jan; 7(1):284-296. PubMed ID: 38150300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of adhesion of modern wound dressings: a comparative analysis of 56 different wound dressings.
    Klode J; Schöttler L; Stoffels I; Körber A; Schadendorf D; Dissemond J
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2011 Aug; 25(8):933-9. PubMed ID: 21062365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin changes induced by a zinc oxide dressing compared with a hydrocolloid dressing in healthy individuals.
    Nielsen LF; Blume N; Romme T; Samuelsen P; Everland H; Ifversen P; Karlsmark T
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15807813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristic differences in barrier and hygroscopic properties between normal and cosmetic dry skin. I. Enhanced barrier analysis with sequential tape-stripping.
    Lu N; Chandar P; Tempesta D; Vincent C; Bajor J; McGuiness H
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2014 Apr; 36(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 24397786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation study of the properties of two adhesive foam dressings.
    Viamontes L; Jones AM
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Jun; 12(11 Suppl):S43-4, S46-9. PubMed ID: 12829978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized and controlled comparison of gentleness of 2 medical adhesive tapes in healthy human subjects.
    Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Houser TP; Smith GE; Koski NI
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 23202590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison among several foam dressings in the properties of water-absorption, water-locking and air permeability].
    Ge TC; Xing N; Chen J; Zhou JJ; Su GL; Shi JW; Zheng YS
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 28(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 23290760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of adhesive dressings on stratum corneum conductance.
    Cavallini M; Gazzola R; Vaienti L
    Skin Res Technol; 2012 May; 18(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 22092993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a hydrocolloid dressing containing ceramide-2 on split-thickness wounds in a laser-induced erosion model.
    Tsuchiya S; Ichioka S; Sekiya N; Tajima S; Iwasaki T; Numata S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 May; 26(5):224-9. PubMed ID: 23591096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal.
    Löffler H; Dreher F; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 151(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 15491413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Allevyn Adhesive and Biatain Adhesive in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Amione P; Ricci E; Topo F; Izzo L; Pirovano R; Rega V; Cocci C; Masina M
    J Wound Care; 2005 Sep; 14(8):365-70. PubMed ID: 16178291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.