These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22068632)

  • 1. Engagement agents in the making: on the front lines of socio-technical integration : commentary on: "Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies".
    Conley SN
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 22068632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies.
    te Kulve H; Rip A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):699-714. PubMed ID: 21898147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Art for public engagement on emerging and controversial technologies: A literature review.
    Fraaije A; van der Meij MG; Kupper F; Broerse JEW
    Public Underst Sci; 2022 Aug; 31(6):694-710. PubMed ID: 35570661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society: the case of 'public engagement in science'.
    Bensaude Vincent B
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Apr; 23(3):238-53. PubMed ID: 24495899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technologies of democracy: experiments and demonstrations.
    Laurent B
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):649-66. PubMed ID: 21853368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Publics in the making: mediating different methods of engagement and the publics these construct : commentary on: "Technologies of democracy: experiments and demonstrations".
    Mohr A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 21984332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The broad challenge of public engagement in science: commentary on: "Constitutional moments in governing science and technology".
    van Est R
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):639-48. PubMed ID: 21785999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Redesigning the architecture of policy-making: Engaging with Māori on nanotechnology in New Zealand.
    Munshi D; Kurian PA; Morrison T; Morrison SL
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Apr; 25(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 25193966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.
    Kyle R; Dodds S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2009 Mar; 15(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 18825510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reflecting on public engagement and science policy.
    Jones RA
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24434708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building.
    Selin C; Rawlings KC; de Ridder-Vignone K; Sadowski J; Altamirano Allende C; Gano G; Davies SR; Guston DH
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(6):634-649. PubMed ID: 26769749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimenting with engagement : commentary on: Taking our own medicine: on an experiment in science communication.
    Lewenstein BV
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):817-21. PubMed ID: 22095058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".
    Wynne B
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 22015948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Building the capacity for public engagement with science in the United States.
    Guston DH
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 24434713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negotiating community engagement and science in the federal environmental public health sector.
    Little PC
    Med Anthropol Q; 2009 Jun; 23(2):94-118. PubMed ID: 19562950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why should we promote public engagement with science?
    Stilgoe J; Lock SJ; Wilsdon J
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 24434705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public health and political science: challenges and opportunities for a productive partnership.
    Fafard P; Cassola A
    Public Health; 2020 Sep; 186():107-109. PubMed ID: 32795769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.
    Gehrke PJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23887250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.