331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22070793)
1. Fetal and maternal heart rate confusion during intra-partum monitoring: comparison of trans-abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and Doppler telemetry.
Stampalija T; Signaroldi M; Mastroianni C; Rosti E; Signorelli V; Casati D; Ferrazzi EM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1517-20. PubMed ID: 22070793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes.
Cohen WR; Ommani S; Hassan S; Mirza FG; Solomon M; Brown R; Schifrin BS; Himsworth JM; Hayes-Gill BR
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Nov; 91(11):1306-13. PubMed ID: 22924738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram.
Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann W; Herrmann E; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 22714064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph.
Nurani R; Chandraharan E; Lowe V; Ugwumadu A; Arulkumaran S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1428-32. PubMed ID: 22881463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques.
Cohen WR; Hayes-Gill B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 24684703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integration of multivariate empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis for fetal ECG separation from abdominal signals.
Thanaraj P; Roshini M; Balasubramanian P
Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov; 24(6):783-794. PubMed ID: 27315149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of maternal anxiety and music on fetal movements and fetal heart rate patterns.
Kafali H; Derbent A; Keskin E; Simavli S; Gözdemir E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Mar; 24(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 20608798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
Vullings R; Peters CH; Sluijter RJ; Mischi M; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptive filtering in ECG monitoring of the fetal heart rate.
Frank TH; Blaumanis OR; Gibbs RK; Wells RK
J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():108-13. PubMed ID: 3694088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-time signal processing for fetal heart rate monitoring.
Ibrahimy MI; Ahmed F; Mohd Ali MA; Zahedi E
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 12665042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of fetal heart rate monitoring with transabdominal fetal ECG during maternal movement in labor: A prospective study.
Reis-de-Carvalho C; Nogueira P; Ayres-de-Campos D
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Nov; 101(11):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 35959521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography in labor.
Amer-Wåhlin I; Maršál K
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 21115414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous monitoring of maternal and fetal heart rate variability during labor in relation with fetal gender.
Gonçalves H; Fernandes D; Pinto P; Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J
Dev Psychobiol; 2017 Nov; 59(7):832-839. PubMed ID: 28833043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Avoiding confusion of maternal heart rate with fetal heart rate during labor.
Simpson KR
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2011; 36(4):272. PubMed ID: 21709529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of signal loss on the comparison between computer analyses of the fetal heart rate in labour using pulsed Doppler ultrasound (with autocorrelation) and simultaneous scalp electrocardiogram.
Spencer JA; Belcher R; Dawes GS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 May; 25(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3297840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Continuous telemetric monitoring of fetal oxygen partial pressure during labor.
Braun T; Sierra F; Seiler D; Mainzer K; Wohlschlager M; Tutschek B; Schmidt S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15205977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Fetal heart rate monitoring during maternal swimming].
Sasaki J; Nabeshima Y; Inaba J; Mesaki N
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Feb; 45(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 8429252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings.
Graatsma EM; Jacod BC; van Egmond LA; Mulder EJ; Visser GH
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):334-7; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19076966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of abdominal ECG and Doppler ultrasound for fetal heart rate detection.
Ibrahimy MI; Mohd Ali MA; Zahedi E; Tsuruoka S
Front Med Biol Eng; 2002; 11(4):307-22. PubMed ID: 12735430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
