These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22070793)

  • 21. Home labour induction with retrievable prostaglandin pessary and continuous telemetric trans-abdominal fetal ECG monitoring.
    Rauf Z; O'Brien E; Stampalija T; Ilioniu FP; Lavender T; Alfirevic Z
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e28129. PubMed ID: 22140522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new method to derive fetal heart rate from maternal abdominal electrocardiogram: monitoring fetal heart rate during cesarean section.
    Yeh HM; Chang YC; Lin C; Yeh CH; Lee CN; Shyu MK; Hung MH; Hsiao PN; Wang YH; Tseng YH; Tsao J; Lai LP; Lin LY; Lo MT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117509. PubMed ID: 25680192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Configuration of the fetal electrocardiogram in ambulatory women in labor monitored with wideband telemetry.
    Sampson MB; James JA; Parsons MT; Zuidema LJ; Work BA
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):854-6. PubMed ID: 4078819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microprocessor-controlled doppler. A new fetal heart rate monitoring technique.
    Lauersen NH; Hochberg HM; George ME
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Jun; 27(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 7120215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fetal heart rate variability during pregnancy, obtained from non-invasive electrocardiogram recordings.
    van Laar JO; Warmerdam GJ; Verdurmen KM; Vullings R; Peters CH; Houterman S; Wijn PF; Andriessen P; van Pul C; Guid Oei S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jan; 93(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 24134552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Feasibility of in utero telemetric fetal ECG monitoring in a lamb model.
    Hermans B; Lewi L; Jani J; De Buck F; Deprest J; Puers R
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 18648203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
    Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relative accuracy of computerized intrapartum fetal heart rate pattern recognition by ultrasound and abdominal electrocardiogram detection.
    Hayes-Gill BR; Martin TRP; Liu C; Cohen WR
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):413-422. PubMed ID: 31792930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Actifetus system: a multidoppler sensor system for monitoring fetal movements.
    Kribèche A; Tranquart F; Kouame D; Pourcelot L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 17276580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Toward the improvement in fetal monitoring during labor with the inclusion of maternal heart rate analysis.
    Gonçalves H; Pinto P; Silva M; Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Apr; 54(4):691-9. PubMed ID: 26219610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of pregnancy outcome by combined analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram and systolic time intervals.
    Lewinsky RM; Sharf M; Degani S; Eibschitz I
    Am J Perinatol; 1992; 9(5-6):348-52. PubMed ID: 1418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Modality of fetal heart monitoring during labor (continuous or intermittent), telemetry and central fetal monitoring].
    Bretelle F; Le Du R; Foulhy C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S23-33. PubMed ID: 18187266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Oximetry, fetal ECG and Oxford monitoring (compared to scalp pH)].
    Langer B; Vayssière C; Fritz G; David E
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S72-80. PubMed ID: 18191342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Physiologic basis for fetal heart rate analysis during labour].
    Doret M; Constans A; Gaucherand P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Jun; 39(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 20193988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An efficient unsupervised fetal QRS complex detection from abdominal maternal ECG.
    Varanini M; Tartarisco G; Billeci L; Macerata A; Pioggia G; Balocchi R
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Aug; 35(8):1607-19. PubMed ID: 25069520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator.
    Martinek R; Kelnar M; Koudelka P; Vanus J; Bilik P; Janku P; Nazeran H; Zidek J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Feb; 37(2):238-56. PubMed ID: 26799770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Abdominal electrocardiography in intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Kariniemi V; Rosti J
    J Perinat Med; 1986; 14(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 3820035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fetal ECG analysis for intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a review.
    Devoe LD
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 21278502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A multi-step method with signal quality assessment and fine-tuning procedure to locate maternal and fetal QRS complexes from abdominal ECG recordings.
    Liu C; Li P; Di Maria C; Zhao L; Zhang H; Chen Z
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Aug; 35(8):1665-83. PubMed ID: 25069817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Observations on perinatal heart rate monitoring. II. Quantitative unreliability of Doppler fetal heart rate variability.
    Suidan JS; Young BK; Hochberg HM; George ME
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Jul; 30(7):519-22. PubMed ID: 4032387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.