189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22071068)
1. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems.
Gyamfi Bannerman C; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Blackwell S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):288.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22071068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 5-tier system of assessing fetal heart rate tracings is superior to the 3-tier system in identifying fetal acidemia.
Coletta J; Murphy E; Rubeo Z; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 206(3):226.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22244473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the predictive ability for perinatal acidemia in neonates between the NICHD 3-tier FHR system combined with clinical risk factors and the fetal reserve index.
Pruksanusak N; Chainarong N; Boripan S; Geater A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276451. PubMed ID: 36264912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System.
Blackwell SC; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Gyamfi Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):378.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21864826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: evaluation of a standardized system of interpretation for prediction of metabolic acidosis at delivery and neonatal neurological morbidity.
Soncini E; Paganelli S; Vezzani C; Gargano G; Giovanni Battista LS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Sep; 27(14):1465-9. PubMed ID: 24156253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of five classification systems for interpreting electronic fetal monitoring in predicting neonatal status at birth.
Di Tommaso M; Seravalli V; Cordisco A; Consorti G; Mecacci F; Rizzello F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Mar; 26(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 23039108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Accuracy of the FIGO and the 5-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Classification Systems in the Detection of Neonatal Acidemia.
Martí Gamboa S; Giménez OR; Mancho JP; Moros ML; Sada JR; Mateo SC
Am J Perinatol; 2017 Apr; 34(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 27780275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Observation on validity of the five-tier system for fetal heart rate pattern interpretation proposed by Japan Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Sadaka A; Furuhashi M; Minami H; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Ishikawa K
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 21923306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-observer reliability of 4 fetal heart rate classifications.
Garabedian C; Butruille L; Drumez E; Servan Schreiber E; Bartolo S; Bleu G; Mesdag V; Deruelle P; De Jonckheere J; Houfflin-Debarge V
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 28403968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation.
Hankins GD; Miller DA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21278495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Graded classification of fetal heart rate tracings: association with neonatal metabolic acidosis and neurologic morbidity.
Elliott C; Warrick PA; Graham E; Hamilton EF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):258.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19716539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Documentation improvements following multidisciplinary educational program on electronic fetal heart rate tracings.
Vadnais MA; Golen TH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):741-4. PubMed ID: 21067288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to read fetal heart rate tracings in labor: a comparison between ACOG and NICE guidelines.
Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Martorana R; Martino C; Tranquilli AL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2797-8. PubMed ID: 22881995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined maternal-associated risk factors with intrapartum fetal heart rate classification systems to predict peripartum asphyxia neonates.
Pruksanusak N; Thongphanang P; Suntharasaj T; Suwanrath C; Geater A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Nov; 218():85-91. PubMed ID: 28950192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns during the first stage of labor: effect on perinatal outcome.
Hadar A; Sheiner E; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):863-8. PubMed ID: 11641667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia.
Clark SL; Hamilton EF; Garite TJ; Timmins A; Warrick PA; Smith S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):163.e1-163.e6. PubMed ID: 27751795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now?
Chez BF; Baird SM
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2011; 25(2):180-92; quiz 193-4. PubMed ID: 21540697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography.
Galazios G; Tripsianis G; Tsikouras P; Koutlaki N; Liberis V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 19455348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy.
Sameshima H; Ikenoue T; Ikeda T; Kamitomo M; Ibara S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 14749646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
