These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22071068)

  • 61. Improving Interprofessional Consistency in Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation.
    Govindappagari S; Zaghi S; Zannat F; Reimers L; Goffman D; Kassel I; Bernstein PS
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(8):808-13. PubMed ID: 26906180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns: a randomized controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry.
    Kühnert M; Schmidt S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1989-95. PubMed ID: 15592281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians' interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Arteiro D; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J
    BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):978-84. PubMed ID: 21609381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 177(6):1385-90. PubMed ID: 9423739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Toward quantitative fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Cao H; Lake DE; Ferguson JE; Chisholm CA; Griffin MP; Moorman JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jan; 53(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 16402610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines.
    Macones GA; Hankins GD; Spong CY; Hauth J; Moore T
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2008; 37(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 18761565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
    Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Variable decelerations: do size and shape matter?
    Hamilton E; Warrick P; O'Keeffe D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jun; 25(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 21801143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Response to category II tracings: Does anything help?
    Raghuraman N
    Semin Perinatol; 2020 Mar; 44(2):151217. PubMed ID: 32007313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Practice bulletin no. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1232-40. PubMed ID: 20966730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Easy as ABC: A System to Stratify Category II Fetal Heart Rate Tracings.
    Penfield CA; Hong C; Ibrahim Sel H; Kilpatrick SJ; Gregory KD
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jun; 33(7):688-95. PubMed ID: 26871906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. ST analysis as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring: an overview.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Miller LA
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 24(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20697240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation.
    Parer JT; Hamilton EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 203(5):451.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20633869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Maternal cardiac autonomic function and fetal heart rate in preeclamptic compared to normotensive pregnancies.
    Swansburg ML; Brown CA; Hains SM; Smith GN; Kisilevsky BS
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2005; 15(3):42-52. PubMed ID: 16295797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines.
    Santo S; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Schnettler W; Ugwumadu A; Da Graça LM;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 27869985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Continuous fetal biochemical monitoring and cardiotocography].
    Kaneoka T; Kobayashi H; Uchida K; Shirakawa K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Jun; 40(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 3392436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Fetal pulse oximetry: correlation with intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns and neonatal outcome.
    Tekin A; Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Ozeren S; Corakçi A; Yücesoy I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Oct; 34(5):824-31. PubMed ID: 18834341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Fetal and maternal heart rate confusion during intra-partum monitoring: comparison of trans-abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and Doppler telemetry.
    Stampalija T; Signaroldi M; Mastroianni C; Rosti E; Signorelli V; Casati D; Ferrazzi EM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1517-20. PubMed ID: 22070793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Fetal heart rate tracing patterns associated with congenital hypothyroidism.
    Shoham I; Aricha-Tamir B; Weintraub AY; Mazor M; Wiznitzer A; Holcberg G; Sheiner E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 201(1):48.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19467638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.