These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22071496)

  • 1. Clinical recommendation for treatment planning of sinus augmentation procedures by using presurgical CAT scan images: a preliminary report.
    Kutkut AM; Andreana S; Kim HL; Monaco E
    Implant Dent; 2011 Dec; 20(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 22071496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation and peripheral venous blood for implant-supported rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla: case series.
    Hatano N; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 17716259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 6-month histological analysis on maxillary sinus augmentation with and without use of collagen membranes over the osteotomy window: randomized clinical trial.
    Barone A; Ricci M; Grassi RF; Nannmark U; Quaranta A; Covani U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22151577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation in patients with maxillary sinus pseudocyst: case report.
    Celebi N; Gonen ZB; Kilic E; Etoz O; Alkan A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):e97-102. PubMed ID: 21872500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative comparison of cone beam computed tomography and microradiography in the evaluation of bone density after maxillary sinus augmentation: a preliminary study.
    Soardi CM; Zaffe D; Motroni A; Wang HL
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 23157713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomographic evaluation of sinus augmentation with simultaneous endosseous implant placement.
    Park JB; Lim HS; Yoo KB
    Implant Dent; 2009 Oct; 18(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 22129955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone regeneration in the maxillary sinus using an autologous fibrin-rich block with concentrated growth factors alone.
    Sohn DS; Heo JU; Kwak DH; Kim DE; Kim JM; Moon JW; Lee JH; Park IS
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 21881519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
    Lundgren S; Andersson S; Gualini F; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 15726851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary implant stability in the atrophic sinus floor of human cadaver maxillae: impact of residual ridge height, bone density, and implant diameter.
    Pommer B; Hof M; Fädler A; Gahleitner A; Watzek G; Watzak G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e109-13. PubMed ID: 23167282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sinus Floor Cortication: Classification and Prevalence.
    Choucroun G; Mourlaas J; Kamar Affendi NH; Froum SJ; Cho SC
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 27357253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the anatomy of the maxillary sinus septum using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Park YB; Jeon HS; Shim JS; Lee KW; Moon HS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1070-8. PubMed ID: 21255895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maxillary sinus augmentation.
    Mohan N; Wolf J; Dym H
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):375-88. PubMed ID: 25835800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant placement immediately after the lateral approach of the trap door window procedure to create a maxillary sinus lift without bone grafting: a 2-year retrospective evaluation of 47 implants in 33 patients.
    Chen TW; Chang HS; Leung KW; Lai YL; Kao SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2324-8. PubMed ID: 17954333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Localized management of sinus floor technique for implant placement in fresh molar sockets.
    Bruschi GB; Crespi R; Capparè P; Bravi F; Bruschi E; Gherlone E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 21599829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone regeneration using a hollow hydroxyapatite space-maintaining device for maxillary sinus floor augmentation--a clinical pilot study.
    Johansson LÅ; Isaksson S; Adolfsson E; Lindh C; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 20586781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation surgery with autogenous bone grafts as ceiling: a pilot study and test of principle.
    Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Telleman G; Vissink A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):550-7. PubMed ID: 22171568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary sinus bone augmentation techniques.
    Carrao V; DeMatteis I
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2015 May; 27(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 25797908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bony window repositioning without using a barrier membrane in the lateral approach for maxillary sinus bone grafts: clinical and radiologic results at 6 months.
    Cho YS; Park HK; Park CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 22299099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.