These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22072239)
21. Diagnostic test accuracy of Seol HY; Kim YS; Kim SJ Clin Radiol; 2021 Nov; 76(11):863.e19-863.e25. PubMed ID: 34261597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for suspected primary and postoperative pyogenic spondylitis. Zhang Q; Feng H; Li J; Feng R J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jan; 18(1):23. PubMed ID: 36627651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 18 FDG PET and PET-CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. A meta-analysis. Yi X; Fan M; Liu Y; Zhang H; Liu S J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Dec; 57(6):674-9. PubMed ID: 24283555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of gallium-68 somatostatin receptor and Liu X; Li N; Jiang T; Xu H; Ran Q; Shu Z; Wu J; Li Y; Zhou S; Zhang B Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(2):188-200. PubMed ID: 32716410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gallbladder cancer: A meta-analysis. Annunziata S; Pizzuto DA; Caldarella C; Galiandro F; Sadeghi R; Treglia G World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(40):11481-8. PubMed ID: 26523112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET for characterisation of cardiac masses compared to conventional imaging techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis. Kim K; Ko WS; Kim SJ Br J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 95(1135):20210263. PubMed ID: 35612548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic performance of FDG PET or PET/CT in prosthetic infection after arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Jin H; Yuan L; Li C; Kan Y; Hao R; Yang J Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Mar; 58(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 24469570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Systematic Review on the Additional Value of 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Staging Follicular Lymphoma. Adams HJ; Nievelstein RA; Kwee TC J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 27560022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Kim SJ; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Pak K; Kim K J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):307-313. PubMed ID: 30922755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A meta-analysis of the value of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/PET-CT in the evaluation of fever of unknown origin. Dong MJ; Zhao K; Liu ZF; Wang GL; Yang SY; Zhou GJ Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):834-44. PubMed ID: 21131151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas by 18F-FDG-PET. Younis MH; Abu-Hijleh HA; Aldahamsheh OO; Abualruz A; Thalib L Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 31887730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: which one is the best?--a meta-analysis. Liu T; Xu JY; Xu W; Bai YR; Yan WL; Yang HL Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 Jun; 23(5):350-8. PubMed ID: 21094027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2103-2115. PubMed ID: 30603894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the assessment of pleural abnormalities in cancer patients: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Treglia G; Sadeghi R; Annunziata S; Lococo F; Cafarotti S; Prior JO; Bertagna F; Ceriani L; Giovanella L Lung Cancer; 2014 Jan; 83(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 24290256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in thyroid cancer patients; A systematic review and metaanalysis. Kim DH; Kim SJ Clin Imaging; 2020 Sep; 65():100-107. PubMed ID: 32387798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bosma SE; Vriens D; Gelderblom H; van de Sande MAJ; Dijkstra PDS; Bloem JL Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1735-1746. PubMed ID: 31016339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kim SJ; Lee SW J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 33(3):576-582. PubMed ID: 28994187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The utility of Zhang Q; Xi Y; Li D; Yuan Z; Dong J J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jun; 15(1):229. PubMed ID: 32571371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT with bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis: a meta-analysis. Cheng X; Li Y; Xu Z; Bao L; Li D; Wang J Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):779-87. PubMed ID: 21712464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic Performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT for the Detection of Recurrent Esophageal Cancer After Treatment with Curative Intent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Goense L; van Rossum PS; Reitsma JB; Lam MG; Meijer GJ; van Vulpen M; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R J Nucl Med; 2015 Jul; 56(7):995-1002. PubMed ID: 25952733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]