117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22074015)
1. Benefits of the HiRes 120 coding strategy combined with the Harmony processor in an adult European multicentre study.
Büchner A; Lenarz T; Boermans PP; Frijns JH; Mancini P; Filipo R; Fielden C; Cooper H; Eklöf M; Freijd A; Lombaard S; Meerton L; Pickerill M; Vanat Z; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Kienast B; Boyle P; Arnold L; Meyer B; Sterkers O; Müller-Deile J; Ambrosch P; Helbig S; Frachet B; Gallego S; Truy E; Jeffs E; Morant A; Marco J
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 132(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 22074015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of the Harmony™ behind-the-ear processor with the first generation of Advanced Bionics™ implant systems.
Brendel M; Rottmann T; Lenarz T; Buechner A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jan; 14(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 23340091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Honeder C; Ehrenreich I; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e272-81. PubMed ID: 25127325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.
Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of perceptual channels in children implanted with a HiRes 90K device.
Mancini P; Bosco E; D'agosta L; Traisci G; Nicastri M; Capelli G; Ballantyne D; Filipo R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 129(12):1442-50. PubMed ID: 19922095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
Pijl S
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies.
Buechner A; Brendel M; Krüeger B; Frohne-Büchner C; Nogueira W; Edler B; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 18223448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two cochlear implant speech processors in better versus poorer performers.
Cafarelli Dees D; George C; Stevenson F; Sheridan C; Haacke NP
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():258-60. PubMed ID: 7668660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new audio processor for combined electric and acoustic stimulation for the treatment of partial deafness.
Lorens A; Zgoda M; Skarzynski H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 132(7):739-50. PubMed ID: 22668312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
Han D; Liu B; Zhou N; Chen X; Kong Y; Liu H; Zheng Y; Xu L
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 19194297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
Mens LH; Berenstein CK
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
