BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22074229)

  • 21. Comparing discriminant analysis and neural network for the determination of sex using femur head measurements.
    Alunni V; Jardin Pd; Nogueira L; Buchet L; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Aug; 253():81-7. PubMed ID: 26093772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New identification criteria for the Chilean population: Estimation of sex and stature.
    Ross AH; Manneschi MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jan; 204(1-3):206.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20728293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region.
    Kimmerle EH; Ross A; Slice D
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 18279240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sex determination from the head of the femur of South African whites and blacks.
    Asala SA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Mar; 117(1-2):15-22. PubMed ID: 11230942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sexual dimorphism in the tarsal bones: implications for sex determination.
    Harris SM; Case DT
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 22211822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sex determination from the femur in Portuguese populations with classical and machine-learning classifiers.
    Curate F; Umbelino C; Perinha A; Nogueira C; Silva AM; Cunha E
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Nov; 52():75-81. PubMed ID: 28866285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Univariate Approach to Sex Estimation for the Fragmentary Upper Limb.
    Bongiovanni R; LeGarde CB
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):356-360. PubMed ID: 28631395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sex estimation of the humerus: A geometric morphometric analysis in an adult sample.
    López-Lázaro S; Pérez-Fernández A; Alemán I; Viciano J
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101773. PubMed ID: 32810795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of sex and body weight determination from the proximal femur using DXA technology and its potential for forensic anthropology.
    Wheatley BP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):141-5. PubMed ID: 15567618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sexual dimorphism of the humerus in contemporary Cretans--a population-specific study and a review of the literature*.
    Kranioti EF; Michalodimitrakis M
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Sep; 54(5):996-1000. PubMed ID: 19627412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A geometric-morphometric study of the Cretan humerus for sex identification.
    Kranioti EF; Bastir M; Sánchez-Meseguer A; Rosas A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):111.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19446415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex determination from the second cervical vertebra: a test of Wescott's method on a modern American sample.
    Bethard JD; Seet BL
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 22563852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sex estimation based on femoral measurements using multidetector computed tomography in cadavers in modern Japan.
    Chiba F; Makino Y; Torimitsu S; Motomura A; Inokuchi G; Ishii N; Hoshioka Y; Abe H; Yamaguchi R; Sakuma A; Nagasawa S; Saito H; Yajima D; Fukui Y; Iwase H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():262.e1-262.e6. PubMed ID: 30366724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A study of sexual dimorphism in the femur among North Indians.
    Srivastava R; Saini V; Rai RK; Pandey S; Tripathi SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 21854380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Osteometric sex determination of burned human skeletal remains.
    Gonçalves D; Thompson TJ; Cunha E
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Oct; 20(7):906-11. PubMed ID: 24112343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distal Humerus Morphological Variation and Sex Estimation in Modern Thai Individuals.
    Tallman SD; Blanton AI
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):361-371. PubMed ID: 31643085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A geometric morphometric approach to sex determination of the human adult os coxa.
    Bytheway JA; Ross AH
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 20384930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Size and shape differences in the distal femur and proximal tibia between normal weight and obese American Whites.
    Harrington KI; Wescott DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S32-8. PubMed ID: 25274066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A method for sex estimation using the proximal femur.
    Curate F; Coelho J; Gonçalves D; Coelho C; Ferreira MT; Navega D; Cunha E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():579.e1-579.e7. PubMed ID: 27373600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of Purkait's triangle method and alternative models for sex assessment from the proximal femur in the Spanish population.
    Djorojevic M; Roldán C; Botella M; Alemán I
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 25951948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.