213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22074771)
1. Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan.
DeGrazia D
J Med Ethics; 2012 Mar; 38(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 22074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
Agar N
J Med Ethics; 2013 Feb; 39(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 22923439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Still unconvinced, but still tentative: a reply to DeGrazia.
Buchanan A
J Med Ethics; 2012 Mar; 38(3):140-1. PubMed ID: 22138729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Persons, post-persons and thresholds.
Wilson J
J Med Ethics; 2012 Mar; 38(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 22138723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. We must create beings with moral standing superior to our own.
Rakić V
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25473858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The harms of enhancement and the conclusive reasons view.
Douglas T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 25473855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equality and the treatment-enhancement distinction.
Holtug N
Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 19659850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human enhancement and supra-personal moral status.
Douglas T
Philos Stud; 2013 Feb; 162(3):473-497. PubMed ID: 23576821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Will cognitive enhancement create post-persons? The use(lessness) of induction in determining the likelihood of moral status enhancement.
Mihailov E; Dragomir A
Bioethics; 2018 Jun; 32(5):308-313. PubMed ID: 29726022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eight Kinds of Critters: A Moral Taxonomy for the Twenty-Second Century.
Bess M
J Med Philos; 2018 Sep; 43(5):585-612. PubMed ID: 30189038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 'My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm': an argument against moral enhancement.
Tonkens R
J Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 41(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 24748649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic enhancement, post-persons, and moral status: author reply to commentaries.
Degrazia D
J Med Ethics; 2012 Mar; 38(3):145-7. PubMed ID: 22180169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Could it be permissible to prevent the existence of morally enhanced people?
Persson I
J Med Ethics; 2012 Nov; 38(11):692-3. PubMed ID: 22918293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Moral Enhancement and Those Left Behind.
Archer A
Bioethics; 2016 Sep; 30(7):500-10. PubMed ID: 26833687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human enhancement and sexual dimorphism.
Sparrow R
Bioethics; 2012 Nov; 26(9):464-75. PubMed ID: 21518376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive diversity and moral enhancement.
Gyngell C; Easteal S
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 25473859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morally relevant differences between animals and human beings justifying the use of animals in biomedical research.
Dennis JU
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1997 Mar; 210(5):612-8. PubMed ID: 9054986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. We must not create beings with moral standing superior to our own.
Agar N
J Med Ethics; 2013 Nov; 39(11):709. PubMed ID: 23436908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Imagining human enhancement: whose future, which rationality?
Tomasini F
Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(6):497-507. PubMed ID: 18322820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias.
Rakić V
J Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 40(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 23412695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
