These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22074868)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of proximal enamel subsurface demineralization and its relationship with calcium loss and lesion depth.
    Onem E; Baksi BG; Sen BH; Sögüt O; Mert A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 22074868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of Digora Optime storage phosphor plates for proximal subsurface demineralization: effect of different exposure times.
    Önem E; Baksı BG; Şen BH; Mert A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5):e78-84. PubMed ID: 22981097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of artificial demineralization bordering different types of laminate veneers using visual inspection and storage phosphor radiography.
    Cömlekoğlu E; Önem E; Dündar Çömlekoğlu M; Baksı BG; Mert A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1507-14. PubMed ID: 23053699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of a photostimulable storage phosphor digital system with or without the sharpen filter and cone beam CT for detecting approximal enamel subsurface demineralization.
    Belém MD; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120313. PubMed ID: 23412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography.
    Ferreira RI; Haiter-Neto F; Tabchoury CP; de Paiva GA; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16878203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
    Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
    Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization.
    Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography.
    Halse A; Espelid I; Tveit AB; White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8139837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study.
    Nielsen LL; Hoernoe M; Wenzel A
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Sep; 6(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 9115972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces.
    Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Martignon S; Ellwood R; Alatsaris M; Nugent Z
    Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 17284913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
    Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scanning?
    Soğur E; Gröndahl HG; Baksı BG; Mert A
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 22244624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.