These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22074912)

  • 1. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.
    McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy.
    Hamstra DA; Johnson SB; Daignault S; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Taylor JM; Larkin K; Wood A; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25277673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.
    Housten AJ; Kamath GR; Bevers TB; Cantor SB; Dixon N; Hite A; Kallen MA; Leal VB; Li L; Volk RJ
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31795820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients.
    Ferguson M; Shapiro GD; McDonald SD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100929. PubMed ID: 36931434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy.
    van Weert JCM; Alblas MC; van Dijk L; Jansen J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Jan; 104(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 32727670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment.
    Tait AR; Voepel-Lewis T; Brennan-Martinez C; McGonegal M; Levine R
    Am J Med; 2012 Nov; 125(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 22939094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(6):661-71. PubMed ID: 20375419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.
    Hawley ST; Zikmund-Fisher B; Ubel P; Jancovic A; Lucas T; Fagerlin A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):448-55. PubMed ID: 18755566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What eye-tracking methods can reveal about the role of information format in decision-aid processing: an exploratory study.
    Poirier MW; Decker C; Spertus JA; McDowd JM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Nov; 102(11):1977-1984. PubMed ID: 31176556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review.
    Hildon Z; Allwood D; Black N
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Feb; 24(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22166856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records.
    Brewer NT; Gilkey MB; Lillie SE; Hesse BW; Sheridan SL
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):545-53. PubMed ID: 22472914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients-A web-based randomized controlled trial.
    Kasper J; van de Roemer A; Pöttgen J; Rahn A; Backhus I; Bay Y; Köpke S; Heesen C
    Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 27981688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial.
    Edwards A; Thomas R; Williams R; Ellner AL; Brown P; Elwyn G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):336-49. PubMed ID: 16860964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of graphic format on breast cancer risk communication.
    Schapira MM; Nattinger AB; McAuliffe TL
    J Health Commun; 2006 Sep; 11(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 16950729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.
    Asada Y; Abel H; Skedgel C; Warner G
    Milbank Q; 2017 Dec; 95(4):801-835. PubMed ID: 29226437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Picture This: Presenting Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Research Study Results to Patients.
    Tolbert E; Brundage M; Bantug E; Blackford AL; Smith K; Snyder C;
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):994-1005. PubMed ID: 30132393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Smith DM; Derry HA; McClure JB; Stark A; Pitsch RK; Fagerlin A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Nov; 73(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 18602242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.
    Smith SK; Trevena L; Nutbeam D; Barratt A; McCaffery KJ
    Health Expect; 2008 Jun; 11(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 18494957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.