186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22075162)
1. Does a high-flexion design affect early outcome of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty? Clinical comparison at 2 years.
Geller JA; Yoon RS; McKean J; Macaulay W
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1468-74. PubMed ID: 22075162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Marr JT
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of a rotating-platform, high-flexion knee design three- to five-year follow-up.
Meftah M; Ranawat AS; Ranawat CS
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21621961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early range of motion of the scorpio non-restrictive geometry cruciate-retaining total knee system.
Colwell CW; Gelber JD; Pulido PA; Casey KM
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):751-5. PubMed ID: 21036012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Greater satisfaction in older patients with a mobile-bearing compared with fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Lizaur-Utrilla A; Sanz-Reig J; Trigueros-Rentero MA
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 21752586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 5- to 16-year follow-up of 54 consecutive lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasties with a fixed-all polyethylene bearing.
Lustig S; Elguindy A; Servien E; Fary C; Munini E; Demey G; Neyret P
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1318-25. PubMed ID: 21414745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study.
Kim YH; Choi Y; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(10):1911-20. PubMed ID: 20720134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis for the treatment of medial compartment knee disease: 2 to 5 year follow-up.
Heller S; Fenichel I; Salai M; Luria T; Velkes S
Isr Med Assoc J; 2009 May; 11(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 19637502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five- to eight-year results of a prospective study in 118 arthroplasties using posterior-stabilized rotating-platform knee implants.
Maniar RN; Gupta H; Singh A; Johorey AC; Singhi T
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 20541357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-flex rotating platform knee implants: two- to 6-year results of a prospective study.
Maniar RN; Singhi T
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 21945080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Achieving deep flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Tarabichi S; Tarabichi Y; Hawari M
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 19106030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Bi-Surface total knee arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up study.
Nakamura S; Kobayashi M; Ito H; Nakamura K; Ueo T; Nakamura T
Knee; 2010 Aug; 17(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 20303765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: survivorship and prevalence of osteolysis: results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(15):1378-84. PubMed ID: 22854990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do we need a gender-specific total knee replacement? A randomised controlled trial comparing a high-flex and a gender-specific posterior design.
Thomsen MG; Husted H; Bencke J; Curtis D; Holm G; Troelsen A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 22628593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fixed versus rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.
Ball ST; Sanchez HB; Mahoney OM; Schmalzried TP
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):531-6. PubMed ID: 20932706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early results with the Genesis II Posterior Stabilized High Flexion knee prosthesis. A one year follow-up study.
Zeh A; Davis J; Laskin R; Klima S; Wohlrab D
Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Dec; 75(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 20166362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early adverse results with bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort comparison to total knee arthroplasty.
Morrison TA; Nyce JD; Macaulay WB; Geller JA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):35-9. PubMed ID: 21704484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components.
Nutton RW; van der Linden ML; Rowe PJ; Gaston P; Wade FA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jan; 90(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18160497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Kirschner S; Walther M; Böhm D; Matzer M; Heesen T; Faller H; König A
Rheumatol Int; 2003 Jan; 23(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12548437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo knee kinematics in patients with bilateral total knee arthroplasty of 2 designs.
Okamoto N; Breslauer L; Hedley AK; Mizuta H; Banks SA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):914-8. PubMed ID: 20870383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
