173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22075412)
1. A randomized comparison of sirolimus- vs. paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of bifurcation lesions by single stent and kissing balloon: results of the SINGLE KISS trial.
Nasu K; Oikawa Y; Yoshikawa R; Kadotani M; Takeda Y; Ota H; Kamiya H; Muto M; Okamura A; Yamaki M; Usui S; Tohara S; Yamashita J; Suzuki M; Kawaguchi R; Kawajiri K; Nakatsu Y; Uchida Y; Kashima Y; Kawashima N; Ozaki T; Ogawa T; Aizawa T; Suzuki T;
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 166(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 22075412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations intervention: a meta-analysis of five clinical trials.
Qian J; Chen Z; Ma J; Ge J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 80(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 22045690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crush stenting in treating coronary bifurcate lesions: paclitaxel eluting stents versus sirolimus eluting stents.
Chen SL; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Chen YD; Zhu ZS; Lin S; Tian NL; Liu ZZ; Fang WY; Sun XW; Hu DY; Kwan TW
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Mar; 121(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 18364140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year clinical outcomes of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a permanent polymer paclitaxel-eluting stent: final results of the intracoronary stenting and angiographic restenosis - test equivalence between two drug-eluting stents (ISAR-TEST) trial.
King L; Byrne RA; Mehilli J; Schömig A; Kastrati A; Pache J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jan; 81(1):E23-8. PubMed ID: 22431239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of six-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents to bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis of the RESEARCH (rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) and T-SEARCH (taxus stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) registries.
Simsek C; Magro M; Boersma E; Onuma Y; Nauta S; Daemen J; Gaspersz M; van Geuns RJ; van der Giessen W; van Domburg R; Serruys P
J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 23(8):336-41. PubMed ID: 21828397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-year results of the CRISTAL Trial, a randomized comparison of cypher sirolimus-eluting coronary stents versus balloon angioplasty for restenosis of drug-eluting stents.
Chevalier B; Moulichon R; Teiger E; Brunel P; Metzger JP; Pansieri M; Carrie D; Stoll HP; Wittebols K; Spaulding C; Fajadet J;
J Interv Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 25(6):586-95. PubMed ID: 22994863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six-month angiographic and one-year clinical outcomes of polymer free paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison with permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent.
Dang Q; Li YJ; Gao L; Jin Z; Gou LX
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Oct; 125(19):3393-7. PubMed ID: 23044294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents vs. paclitaxel-eluting stents in unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
Song PS; Ryu DR; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi JH; Choi SH; Lee SH; Hong KP; Park JE; Gwon HC
Clin Cardiol; 2011 Jun; 34(6):378-83. PubMed ID: 21538383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Drug-eluting stent for the treatment of small coronary lesion: comparison between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent.
Li JJ; Xu B; Yang YJ; Chen JL; Qiao SB; Ma WH; Qin XW; Yao M; Liu HB; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; You SJ; Dai J; Xia R; Gao RL
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Apr; 120(7):569-73. PubMed ID: 17442204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sirolimus-eluting stent showed better one-year outcomes than paclitaxel-eluting stent in a real life setting of coronary intervention in Koreans.
Suh JW; Park JS; Cho HJ; Kim MS; Kang HJ; Cho YS; Koo BK; Chung WY; Youn TJ; Chae IH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Sohn DW; Oh BH; Park YB
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 117(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17292498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-year outcomes following sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (from the REWARDS Registry).
Hanna NN; Gaglia MA; Torguson R; Ben-Dor I; Gonzalez MA; Collins SD; Syed AI; Maluenda G; Kaneshige K; Xue Z; Satler LF; Kent KM; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 20691308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential long-term outcomes of zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: two-year subgroup analysis of the ZEST randomized trial.
Jang SJ; Park DW; Kim WJ; Kim YH; Yun SC; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 81(7):1106-14. PubMed ID: 22899589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Twelve-month clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent as compared to paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Cassese S; Piccolo R; Galasso G; De Rosa R; Piscione F
Int J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 150(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 21315461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year outcome of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in coronary bifurcation lesions: the provisional side branch stenting approach versus the elective two-stent approach.
Tamura T; Kimura T; Morimoto T; Nakagawa Y; Furukawa Y; Kadota K; Tatami R; Kawai K; Sone T; Miyazaki S; Mitsudo K;
EuroIntervention; 2011 Sep; 7(5):588-96. PubMed ID: 21930463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.
Stone GW; Midei M; Newman W; Sanz M; Hermiller JB; Williams J; Farhat N; Caputo R; Xenopoulos N; Applegate R; Gordon P; White RM; Sudhir K; Cutlip DE; Petersen JL;
Circulation; 2009 Feb; 119(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 19171853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in complex patient and lesions subsets.
Roy P; Torguson R; Okabe T; Pinto Slottow TL; Steinberg DH; Smith K; Xue Z; Gevorkian N; Satler LL; Kent KM; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Aug; 70(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 17503503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary bifurcations results: from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry.
Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Jeong MH; Kim HS; Seong IW; Yang JY; Rha SW; Jang Y; Yoon JH; Tahk SJ; Seung KB; Park SJ; Gwon HC
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 55(16):1743-50. PubMed ID: 20394879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Six-year clinical outcomes of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tarantini G; Barioli A; Facchin M; Frigo AC; Napodano M; Buja P; D'Amico G; Iliceto S; Isabella G
Coron Artery Dis; 2013 Aug; 24(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 23695366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year outcome of patients treated with sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (from the REWARDS Registry).
Roy P; Bonello L; de Labriolle A; Okabe T; Pinto Slottow TL; Steinberg DH; Torguson R; Smith K; Xue Z; Satler LF; Kent KM; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 102(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 18638589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized comparison of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial.
Leon MB; Mauri L; Popma JJ; Cutlip DE; Nikolsky E; O'Shaughnessy C; Overlie PA; McLaurin BT; Solomon SL; Douglas JS; Ball MW; Caputo RP; Jain A; Tolleson TR; Reen BM; Kirtane AJ; Fitzgerald PJ; Thompson K; Kandzari DE;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Feb; 55(6):543-54. PubMed ID: 20152559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
