These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22075437)

  • 21. Poly-ε-caprolactone scaffold for the reinforcement of stapled small intestinal anastomoses: a randomized experimental study.
    Larsen KD; Westerholt M; Madsen GI; Le DQS; Qvist N; Ellebæk MB
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2019 Dec; 404(8):1009-1016. PubMed ID: 31776655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. Or not?
    Giaccaglia V; Antonelli MS; Addario Chieco P; Cocorullo G; Cavallini M; Gulotta G
    J Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 197(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 25918006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.
    Akiyoshi T; Ueno M; Fukunaga Y; Nagayama S; Fujimoto Y; Konishi T; Kuroyanagi H; Yamaguchi T
    Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21871980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stapled intestinal anastomosis is a simple and reliable method for management of intestinal caliber discrepancy in children.
    Sato K; Uchida H; Tanaka Y; Takazawa S; Jimbo T; Deie K
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2012 Sep; 28(9):893-8. PubMed ID: 22864546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical results using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular staplers.
    Jones WB; Myers KM; Traxler LB; Bour ES
    Am Surg; 2008 Jun; 74(6):462-7; discussion 467-8. PubMed ID: 18556986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of staple line number and configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis: An ex vivo study.
    Quitzan JG; Singh A; Beaufrère H; Saleh TM
    Vet Surg; 2022 Jul; 51(5):781-787. PubMed ID: 35500144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Buttressing staples with cholecyst-derived extracellular matrix (CEM) reinforces staple lines in an ex vivo peristaltic inflation model.
    Burugapalli K; Chan JC; Kelly JL; Pandit A
    Obes Surg; 2008 Nov; 18(11):1418-23. PubMed ID: 18459017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of 5-mm Staple in Neonatal Intestinal Surgery.
    Sedano JVR; Castro BA; Alelu RM; Vázquez AG; Fraile AG; Novillo IC
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Sep; 31(9):1092-1095. PubMed ID: 34252323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of staple and suture techniques for end-to-end anastomosis of the small colon in horses.
    Hanson RR; Nixon AJ; Calderwood-Mays M; Gronwall R; Pendergast JF
    Am J Vet Res; 1988 Sep; 49(9):1621-8. PubMed ID: 3066246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A novel modification of double stapling technique in Billroth I anastomosis.
    An JY; Yoon SH; Pak KH; Heo GU; Oh SJ; Hyung WJ; Noh SH
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 100(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 19697394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experience performing 64 consecutive stapled intestinal anastomoses in small children and infants.
    Mitchell IC; Barber R; Fischer AC; Schindel DT
    J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Jan; 46(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 21238653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques.
    Jamshidi R; Stephenson JT; Clay JG; Pichakron KO; Harrison MR
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Jan; 44(1):222-8. PubMed ID: 19159747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Experimental study on the resistance to intraluminal pressure between handsewn and stapled anastomosis. In vitro experimental study].
    Coros MF; Georgescu R; Benedek Z; Sorlea S; Pascarenco G; Mesaros C; Hankó-Bauer O
    Orv Hetil; 2017 Oct; 158(42):1674-1680. PubMed ID: 29037059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro evaluation of an inverted end-to-end equine jejunojejunal anastomosis using skin staples.
    Gandini M; Bertuglia A
    Vet Surg; 2006 Oct; 35(7):678-82. PubMed ID: 17026555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design.
    Contini E; Godek ML; Whiffen JM; Bronson DG
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Profiling Surgical Staplers: How to Increase the Strength of Anastomoses between the Edematous and Normal Intestine.
    Kimura M; Terashita Y
    Am Surg; 2016 Dec; 82(12):e333-335. PubMed ID: 28234160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoscopic small bowel resection and anastomosis.
    Soper NJ; Brunt LM; Fleshman J; Dunnegan DL; Clayman RV
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1993 Feb; 3(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 8258075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surgical adhesive increases burst pressure and seals leaks in stapled gastrojejunostomy.
    Nandakumar G; Richards BG; Trencheva K; Dakin G
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2010; 6(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 20176513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Resection anastomosis of the small intestine by celioscopy in swine. Comparative experimental study between manual and mechanical anastomosis].
    Noël P; Fagot H; Fabre JM; Mann C; Quenet F; Guillon F; Baumel H; Domergue J
    Ann Chir; 1994; 48(10):921-9. PubMed ID: 7733592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the mechanical strength and patency of functional end-to-end anastomoses.
    Goto T; Kawasaki K; Fujino Y; Kanemitsu K; Kamigaki T; Kuroda D; Suzuki Y; Kuroda Y
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1508-11. PubMed ID: 17285383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.