767 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22076066)
1. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.
Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic transabdominal approach partial intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: surgical feasibility and intermediate-term outcome.
Chi P; Huang SH; Lin HM; Lu XR; Huang Y; Jiang WZ; Xu ZB; Chen ZF; Sun YW; Ye DX
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):944-51. PubMed ID: 25245128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS;
Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Orsenigo E; Di Palo S; Vignali A; Staudacher C
Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1():S117-20. PubMed ID: 18023571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach.
Laurent C; Paumet T; Leblanc F; Denost Q; Rullier E
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jan; 14(1):35-41; discussion 42-3. PubMed ID: 21114752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with cT1-T2 low rectal cancer.
Shiomi A; Kinugasa Y; Yamaguchi T; Tsukamoto S; Tomioka H; Kagawa H
Dig Surg; 2013; 30(4-6):272-7. PubMed ID: 23970304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.
Kellokumpu IH; Kairaluoma MI; Nuorva KP; Kautiainen HJ; Jantunen IT
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Aug; 55(8):854-63. PubMed ID: 22810470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between the oncologic outcome of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for T1 and T2 rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma: matched case-control study.
Nakamura T; Kokuba Y; Mitomi H; Onozato W; Hatate K; Satoh T; Ozawa H; Ihara A; Watanabe M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 54(76):1094-7. PubMed ID: 17629046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.
Pugliese R; Di Lernia S; Sansonna F; Scandroglio I; Maggioni D; Ferrari GC; Costanzi A; Magistro C; De Carli S
Am J Surg; 2008 Feb; 195(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 18083137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.
Portier G; Ghouti L; Kirzin S; Guimbaud R; Rives M; Lazorthes F
Br J Surg; 2007 Mar; 94(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 17262755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer.
Denost Q; Adam JP; Pontallier A; Celerier B; Laurent C; Rullier E
Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):138-43. PubMed ID: 25185482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People's Republic of China.
Han JG; Wei GH; Gao ZG; Zheng Y; Wang ZJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 May; 52(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 19502861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
Baek SJ; Al-Asari S; Jeong DH; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Kim NK
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4157-63. PubMed ID: 23708725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Tilney HS; Tekkis PP
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jan; 10(1):3-15; discussion 15-6. PubMed ID: 17477848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection versus laparoscopic pull-through with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancers: a comparative study.
Hiranyakas A; Ho YH
Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 21871983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach.
Yamamoto S; Fujita S; Akasu T; Inada R; Takawa M; Moriya Y
Dig Surg; 2011; 28(5-6):404-9. PubMed ID: 22189000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
