These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22076796)

  • 1. [Investigation on the 3 D geometric accuracy and on the image quality (MTF, SNR and NPS) of volume tomography units (CT, CBCT and DVT)].
    Blendl C; Fiebich M; Voigt JM; Selbach M; Uphoff C
    Rofo; 2012 Jan; 184(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 22076796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
    Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy.
    Bissonnette JP; Moseley D; White E; Sharpe M; Purdie T; Jaffray DA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S57-61. PubMed ID: 18406939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose calculation on kV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the Hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration.
    Rong Y; Smilowitz J; Tewatia D; Tomé WA; Paliwal B
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 19931031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT: image quality and system performance.
    Létourneau D; Wong R; Moseley D; Sharpe MB; Ansell S; Gospodarowicz M; Jaffray DA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(4):1229-37. PubMed ID: 17336223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
    Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of field-of-view and patient size on CT numbers from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Seet KY; Barghi A; Yartsev S; Van Dyk J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6251-62. PubMed ID: 19794246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
    Guan H; Dong H
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6239-50. PubMed ID: 19794241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography.
    Eggers G; Klein J; Welzel T; Mühling J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):639-44. PubMed ID: 18490090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometrical accuracy of the Novalis stereotactic radiosurgery system for trigeminal neuralgia.
    Rahimian J; Chen JC; Rao AA; Girvigian MR; Miller MJ; Greathouse HE
    J Neurosurg; 2004 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():351-5. PubMed ID: 15537189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality control of a kV cone beam computed tomography imaging system].
    Marguet M; Bodez V
    Cancer Radiother; 2009 Sep; 13(5):345-52. PubMed ID: 19615928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
    Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and feasibility of frameless stereotactic and robot-assisted CT-based puncture in interventional radiology: a comparative phantom study.
    Stoffner R; Augschöll C; Widmann G; Böhler D; Bale R
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):851-8. PubMed ID: 19517342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Thomas TH; Devakumar D; Purnima S; Ravindran BP
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2067-77. PubMed ID: 19287087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom.
    Bamba J; Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20120445. PubMed ID: 23956235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
    Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analysis of image quality and dose calculation accuracy in cone beam CT acquisitions with limited projection data (half scan, half fan) with regard to usability for adaptive radiation therapy treatment planning].
    Kowatsch M; Winkler P; Zurl B; Konrad T; Schröttner J
    Z Med Phys; 2011; 21(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 20888201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-year analysis of Elekta CBCT image quality using NPS and MTF.
    Nakahara S; Tachibana M; Watanabe Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):211-222. PubMed ID: 27167279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.