These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22076964)

  • 1. Hippocampal activity during recognition memory co-varies with the accuracy and confidence of source memory judgments.
    Yu SS; Johnson JD; Rugg MD
    Hippocampus; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1429-37. PubMed ID: 22076964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item memory, context memory and the hippocampus: fMRI evidence.
    Rugg MD; Vilberg KL; Mattson JT; Yu SS; Johnson JD; Suzuki M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3070-9. PubMed ID: 22732490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.
    Smith CN; Wixted JT; Squire LR
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(44):15693-702. PubMed ID: 22049412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of the hippocampus to objective but not subjective episodic memory judgments.
    Thakral PP; Yu SS; Rugg MD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Jul; 13(3-4):165-170. PubMed ID: 35148666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In search of recollection and familiarity signals in the hippocampus.
    Wais PE; Squire LR; Wixted JT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 22(1):109-23. PubMed ID: 19199424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amount, not strength of recollection, drives hippocampal activity: A problem for apparent word familiarity-related hippocampal activation.
    Mayes AR; Montaldi D; Roper A; Migo EM; Gholipour T; Kafkas A
    Hippocampus; 2019 Jan; 29(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 30411437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of confidence during item recognition and source memory retrieval: evidence for both dual-process and strength memory theories.
    Hayes SM; Buchler N; Stokes J; Kragel J; Cabeza R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):3959-71. PubMed ID: 21736454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decoding the content of recollection within the core recollection network and beyond.
    Thakral PP; Wang TH; Rugg MD
    Cortex; 2017 Jun; 91():101-113. PubMed ID: 28077212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. True and false memories, parietal cortex, and confidence judgments.
    Urgolites ZJ; Smith CN; Squire LR
    Learn Mem; 2015 Nov; 22(11):557-62. PubMed ID: 26472645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity in the striatum and hippocampus: Across-study convergence.
    King DR; Chastelaine M; Elward RL; Wang TH; Rugg MD
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 354():1-7. PubMed ID: 28803854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
    Taylor JR; Henson RN
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3027-40. PubMed ID: 22898644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age- and performance-related differences in hippocampal contributions to episodic retrieval.
    Sastre M; Wendelken C; Lee JK; Bunge SA; Ghetti S
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 19():42-50. PubMed ID: 26875927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical pattern separation and item-specific memory encoding.
    Pidgeon LM; Morcom AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 May; 85():256-71. PubMed ID: 27018483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.
    Ingram KM; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 21967320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.
    Evans LH; Wilding EL
    J Neurosci; 2012 May; 32(21):7253-7. PubMed ID: 22623670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.
    Wais PE; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 18004949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociations within human hippocampal subregions during encoding and retrieval of spatial information.
    Suthana N; Ekstrom A; Moshirvaziri S; Knowlton B; Bookheimer S
    Hippocampus; 2011 Jul; 21(7):694-701. PubMed ID: 20882543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recollection versus strength as the primary determinant of hippocampal engagement at retrieval.
    Cohn M; Moscovitch M; Lahat A; McAndrews MP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Dec; 106(52):22451-5. PubMed ID: 20007783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information.
    Vilberg KL; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(10):2216-25. PubMed ID: 17449068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pattern Separation and Source Memory Engage Distinct Hippocampal and Neocortical Regions during Retrieval.
    Stevenson RF; Reagh ZM; Chun AP; Murray EA; Yassa MA
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(4):843-851. PubMed ID: 31748377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.