These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22078826)

  • 1. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) may provide greater caries preventive effect compared with composite resin, but high-quality studies are needed.
    Pendrys DG
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2011 Dec; 11(4):180-2. PubMed ID: 22078826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) versus composite resin: a quantitative systematic review.
    Yengopal V; Mickenautsch S
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2011 Feb; 12(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 21299939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
    Beiruti N; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; van Palenstein Helderman WH
    Caries Res; 2006; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluoride rechargability of a non-resin auto-cured glass ionomer cement from a fluoridated dentifrice: an in vitro study.
    Rao A; Rao A; Sudha P
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 21985875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants.
    Oba AA; Dülgergil T; Sönmez IS; Doğan S
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2009 Nov; 108(11):844-8. PubMed ID: 19933027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials.
    Attin T; Vataschki M; Hellwig E
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 9063235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the caries-preventive effect of two fissure sealing modalities in public health care: a single application of glass ionomer and a routine resin-based sealant programme. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
    Kervanto-Seppälä S; Lavonius E; Pietilä I; Pitkäniemi J; Meurman JH; Kerosuo E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Jan; 18(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18086027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.