These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22079009)

  • 1. Parental duties and prenatal screening: does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e837-43. PubMed ID: 22079009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 35(7):410-4. PubMed ID: 19567688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):461-5. PubMed ID: 21429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.
    Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Feb; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 18186151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women's informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458].
    Nagle C; Gunn J; Bell R; Lewis S; Meiser B; Metcalfe S; Ukoumunne OC; Halliday J
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 18190370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome.
    Reid B; Sinclair M; Barr O; Dobbs F; Crealey G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1561-73. PubMed ID: 19783085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey.
    Gourounti K; Sandall J
    Midwifery; 2008 Jun; 24(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 17316936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women's experience of maternal serum screening.
    Carroll JC; Brown JB; Reid AJ; Pugh P
    Can Fam Physician; 2000 Mar; 46():614-20. PubMed ID: 10752000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Feb; 66(3):753-64. PubMed ID: 17996350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does offering prenatal screening influence pregnant women's attitudes regarding prenatal testing?
    Kleinveld JH; van den Berg M; van Eijk JT; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G; Timmermans DR
    Community Genet; 2008; 11(6):368-74. PubMed ID: 18690005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing?
    Remennick L
    Sociol Health Illn; 2006 Jan; 28(1):21-53. PubMed ID: 16509941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'I want a choice, but I don't want to decide'--a qualitative study of pregnant women's experiences regarding early ultrasound risk assessment for chromosomal anomalies.
    Aune I; Möller A
    Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 21130549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study.
    Crombag NM; Boeije H; Iedema-Kuiper R; Schielen PC; Visser GH; Bensing JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16(1):121. PubMed ID: 27229318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient decision-making for clinical genetics.
    Anderson G
    Nurs Inq; 2007 Mar; 14(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 17298604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Congenital anomalies: parents' anxiety and women's concerns before prenatal testing and women's opinions towards the risk factors.
    Sahin NH; Gungor I
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 18279286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deciding to join a perinatal randomised controlled trial: experiences and views of pregnant women enroled in the Magpie Trial.
    Smyth RM; Jacoby A; Elbourne D
    Midwifery; 2012 Aug; 28(4):E478-85. PubMed ID: 21944570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnant women's knowledge and attitudes to prenatal screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: Croatian multicentric survey.
    Kosec V; Zec I; Tislarić-Medenjak D; Kuna K; Simundić AM; Lajtman-Krizaić M; Lovrić B; Mimica M; Estatiev ZK; Borgudan V
    Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 23940994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. For your interest? The ethical acceptability of using non-invasive prenatal testing to test 'purely for information'.
    Deans Z; Clarke AJ; Newson AJ
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25521970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.