109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22079032)
1. Assessment of the learning curve for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Fisher WE; Hodges SE; Wu MF; Hilsenbeck SG; Brunicardi FC
Am J Surg; 2012 Jun; 203(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 22079032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Traverso LW; Shinchi H; Low DE
Am J Surg; 2004 May; 187(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 15135674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience.
Schmidt CM; Turrini O; Parikh P; House MG; Zyromski NJ; Nakeeb A; Howard TJ; Pitt HA; Lillemoe KD
Arch Surg; 2010 Jul; 145(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 20644125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.
Tseng JF; Pisters PW; Lee JE; Wang H; Gomez HF; Sun CC; Evans DB
Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 17383522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective randomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Lin PW; Lin YJ
Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 10361177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does preoperative biliary drainage, method of pancreatic reconstruction or age influence perioperative outcome? A retrospective study of 104 consecutive cases.
Barnett SA; Collier NA
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jul; 76(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 16813619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: a single-center experience in Thailand.
Taweemonkongsap T; Nualyong C; Amornvesukit T; Srinualnad S; Jitpraphai S; Premasathian N; Sujijantararat P; Tantiwong A; Soontrapa S
Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3593-8. PubMed ID: 22172811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality metrics in pancreatic surgery.
Mohammed S; Fisher WE
Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Jun; 93(3):693-709. PubMed ID: 23632153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is patient outcome compromised during the initial experience with robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results of 164 consecutive cases.
Hayn MH; Hellenthal NJ; Seixas-Mikelus SA; Mansour AM; Stegemann A; Hussain A; Guru KA
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6):882-7. PubMed ID: 21166749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy.
Aranha GV; Hodul PJ; Creech S; Jacobs W
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Aug; 197(2):223-31; discussion 231-2. PubMed ID: 12892800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in the elderly?
Brachet D; Lermite E; Vychnevskaia-Bressollette K; Mucci S; Hamy A; Arnaud JP
Hepatogastroenterology; 2012; 59(113):266-71. PubMed ID: 22251548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution--the first step in multidisciplinary team building.
Kennedy EP; Rosato EL; Sauter PK; Rosenberg LM; Doria C; Marino IR; Chojnacki KA; Berger AC; Yeo CJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 May; 204(5):917-23; discussion 923-4. PubMed ID: 17481510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital volume is a determinant of postoperative complications, blood transfusion and length of stay after radical or partial nephrectomy.
Sun M; Bianchi M; Trinh QD; Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Shariat SF; Graefen M; Montorsi F; Perrotte P; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2012 Feb; 187(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 22177151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of complex gastrointestinal procedures performed in a community hospital.
Guzzo MH; Landercasper J; Boyd WC; Lambert PJ
WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):30-4. PubMed ID: 16218313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy in a nonuniversity tertiary care center: what are the key elements of success?
Khithani A; Christian D; Lowe K; Saad AJ; Linder JD; Tarnasky P; Jeyarajah DR
Am Surg; 2011 May; 77(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 21679585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: PPPD versus Whipple procedure.
Lin PW; Shan YS; Lin YJ; Hung CJ
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(65):1601-4. PubMed ID: 16201125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: the learning curve is for operative speed, not for quality.
Ozturk E; da Luz Moreira A; Vogel JD
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Oct; 12(10 Online):e304-9. PubMed ID: 20070328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience in a high-volume laparoscopy reference centre.
Ploussard G; Xylinas E; Salomon L; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; De La Taille A
BJU Int; 2010 Apr; 105(8):1155-60. PubMed ID: 19888970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
