703 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22079087)
1. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.
Janssen WA; van de Sande R; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Mulder CL; Smit A; Widdershoven GA; Steinert T
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective.
Noorthoorn E; Lepping P; Janssen W; Hoogendoorn A; Nijman H; Widdershoven G; Steinert T
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 50(12):1857-69. PubMed ID: 26188503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.
Hotzy F; Moetteli S; Theodoridou A; Schneeberger AR; Seifritz E; Hoff P; Jäger M
Swiss Med Wkly; 2018; 148():w14616. PubMed ID: 29698543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Incidence of coercive measures as an indicator of quality in psychiatric hospitals. Problems of data recording and processing, preliminary results of a benchmarking study].
Martin V; Kuster W; Baur M; Bohnet U; Hermelink G; Knopp M; Kronstorfer R; Martinez-Funk B; Roser M; Voigtländer W; Brandecker R; Steinert T
Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Jan; 34(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 17106840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Use of coercive measures in Norwegian psychiatric institutions].
Høyer G; Drange H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 May; 111(14):1709-13. PubMed ID: 2063377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Changes in the use of compulsory measures in Norwegian psychiatric institutions].
Høyer G; Drange H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Feb; 114(5):585-8. PubMed ID: 8209344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends.
Steinert T; Lepping P; Bernhardsgrütter R; Conca A; Hatling T; Janssen W; Keski-Valkama A; Mayoral F; Whittington R
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 45(9):889-97. PubMed ID: 19727530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seclusion and enforced medication in dealing with aggression: A prospective dynamic cohort study.
Verlinde AA; Noorthoorn EO; Snelleman W; van den Berg H; Snelleman-van der Plas M; Lepping P
Eur Psychiatry; 2017 Jan; 39():86-92. PubMed ID: 27992811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting use of coercive measures in Finland.
Korkeila JA; Tuohimäki C; Kaltiala-Heino R; Lehtinen V; Joukamaa M
Nord J Psychiatry; 2002; 56(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 12470307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing seclusion through involuntary medication: a randomized clinical trial.
Georgieva I; Mulder CL; Noorthoorn E
Psychiatry Res; 2013 Jan; 205(1-2):48-53. PubMed ID: 22951334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of coercive measures in adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment: a nation-wide register study.
Ulla S; Maritta V; Riittakerttu KH
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 47(9):1401-8. PubMed ID: 22113718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe.
Janssen WA; Noorthoorn EO; de Vries WJ; Hutschemeakers GJ; Lendemeijer HH; Widdershoven GA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 31(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 18954906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reasons for using restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care: A nationwide 15-year study.
Keski-Valkama A; Sailas E; Eronen M; Koivisto AM; Lönnqvist J; Kaltiala-Heino R
Nord J Psychiatry; 2010 Apr; 64(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 19883195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of coercive measures in psychiatry.
Mayoral F; Torres F
Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2005; 33(5):331-8. PubMed ID: 16155816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Recording and reducing coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].
Steinert T; Baur M;
Psychiatr Prax; 2004 Nov; 31 Suppl 1():S18-20. PubMed ID: 15570489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion.
van der Schaaf PS; Dusseldorp E; Keuning FM; Janssen WA; Noorthoorn EO
Br J Psychiatry; 2013 Feb; 202():142-9. PubMed ID: 23307922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acceptability and use of coercive methods across differing service configurations with and without seclusion and/or psychiatric intensive care units.
Pettit SA; Bowers L; Tulloch A; Cullen AE; Moylan LB; Sethi F; McCrone P; Baker J; Quirk A; Stewart D
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Apr; 73(4):966-976. PubMed ID: 27809370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of patient characteristics on duration of seclusion/restrain in acute psychiatric settings in Japan.
Noda T; Sugiyama N; Sato M; Ito H; Sailas E; Putkonen H; Kontio R; Joffe G
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 67(6):405-11. PubMed ID: 23941159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decreasing the use of restraint and seclusion among psychiatric inpatients.
Hellerstein DJ; Staub AB; Lequesne E
J Psychiatr Pract; 2007 Sep; 13(5):308-17. PubMed ID: 17890979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of seclusion on a hospital-wide level: successful implementation of a less restrictive policy.
Jungfer HA; Schneeberger AR; Borgwardt S; Walter M; Vogel M; Gairing SK; Lang UE; Huber CG
J Psychiatr Res; 2014 Jul; 54():94-9. PubMed ID: 24726637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
