These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters. Triantafyllou C; Hoge RD; Krueger G; Wiggins CJ; Potthast A; Wiggins GC; Wald LL Neuroimage; 2005 May; 26(1):243-50. PubMed ID: 15862224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Signal and noise characteristics of Hahn SE and GE BOLD fMRI at 7 T in humans. Yacoub E; Van De Moortele PF; Shmuel A; Uğurbil K Neuroimage; 2005 Feb; 24(3):738-50. PubMed ID: 15652309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Unsupervised physiological noise correction of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using phase and magnitude information (PREPAIR). Bancelin D; Bachrata B; Bollmann S; de Lima Cardoso P; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Robinson SD Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Feb; 44(3):1209-1226. PubMed ID: 36401844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The non-separability of physiologic noise in functional connectivity MRI with spatial ICA at 3T. Beall EB; Lowe MJ J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 20600313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Non-white noise in fMRI: does modelling have an impact? Lund TE; Madsen KH; Sidaros K; Luo WL; Nichols TE Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 16099175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Integration of EEG source imaging and fMRI during continuous viewing of natural movies. Whittingstall K; Bartels A; Singh V; Kwon S; Logothetis NK Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Oct; 28(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 20579829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Physiological noise modeling in fMRI based on the pulsatile component of photoplethysmograph. Kassinopoulos M; Mitsis GD Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118467. PubMed ID: 34390877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of speech-related variance in rapid event-related fMRI using a time-aware acquisition system. Mehta S; Grabowski TJ; Razavi M; Eaton B; Bolinger L Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(4):1278-93. PubMed ID: 16412665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Magnetic resonance imaging studies of functional brain activation: analysis and interpretation. McCarthy G; Puce A; Luby M; Belger A; Allison T Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1996; 47():15-31. PubMed ID: 9335966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience. Scarabino T; Giannatempo GM; Popolizio T; Tosetti M; d'Alesio V; Esposito F; Di Salle F; Di Costanzo A; Bertolino A; Maggialetti A; Salvolini U Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 17310287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantification and correction of respiration induced dynamic field map changes in fMRI using 3D single shot techniques. Zahneisen B; Assländer J; LeVan P; Hugger T; Reisert M; Ernst T; Hennig J Magn Reson Med; 2014 Mar; 71(3):1093-102. PubMed ID: 23716298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Initial attempts at directly detecting alpha wave activity in the brain using MRI. Konn D; Leach S; Gowland P; Bowtell R Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1413-27. PubMed ID: 15707791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Physiological noise in human cerebellar fMRI. van der Zwaag W; Jorge J; Butticaz D; Gruetter R MAGMA; 2015 Oct; 28(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 25894812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of denoising on independent component analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Pignat JM; Koval O; Van De Ville D; Voloshynovskiy S; Michel C; Pun T J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Feb; 213(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 23261654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of different cerebrospinal fluid and white matter fMRI filtering strategies-Quantifying noise removal and neural signal preservation. Bartoň M; Mareček R; Krajčovičová L; Slavíček T; Kašpárek T; Zemánková P; Říha P; Mikl M Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Mar; 40(4):1114-1138. PubMed ID: 30403309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Physiologic noise regression, motion regression, and TOAST dynamic field correction in complex-valued fMRI time series. Hahn AD; Rowe DB Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2231-40. PubMed ID: 22001788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]