These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22079870)

  • 1. Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    Cogn Psychol; 2012 Feb; 64(1-2):1-34. PubMed ID: 22079870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition memory zROC slopes for items with correct versus incorrect source decisions discriminate the dual process and unequal variance signal detection models.
    Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Hautus MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1205-25. PubMed ID: 24820667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unitary zROC slope in amnesics does not reflect the absence of recollection: critical simulations in healthy participants of the zROC slope.
    Didi-Barnea C; Peremen Z; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():94-109. PubMed ID: 27235569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R
    J Mem Lang; 2014 Jan; 70():36-52. PubMed ID: 24459327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability of target recollection varies with target-lure relatedness under the dual process signal detection model.
    Dopkins S; Galyer D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Oct; 201():102933. PubMed ID: 31739089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unequal-strength source zROC slopes reflect criteria placement and not (necessarily) memory processes.
    Starns JJ; Pazzaglia AM; Rotello CM; Hautus MJ; Macmillan NA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1377-92. PubMed ID: 23565789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Old processes, new perspectives: Familiarity is correlated with (not independent of) recollection and is more (not equally) variable for targets than for lures.
    Moran R; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Jun; 79():40-67. PubMed ID: 25899705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variation in the standard deviation of the lure rating distribution: Implications for estimates of recollection probability.
    Dopkins S; Varner K; Hoyer D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1658-1664. PubMed ID: 28138833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory.
    Mickes L; Wixted JT; Wais PE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 18087950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three tests and three corrections: comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010).
    Jang Y; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):513-23. PubMed ID: 22390323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mixing strong and weak targets provides no evidence against the unequal-variance explanation of ʐROC slope: a comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010).
    Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 22545617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics.
    Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Nov; 25(6):1415-34. PubMed ID: 10605829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.
    Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):152-76. PubMed ID: 17227185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.
    Ratcliff R; Starns JJ
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 19159148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition memory for source and occurrence: the importance of recollection.
    Quamme JR; Frederick C; Kroll NE; Yonelinas AP; Dobbins IG
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Sep; 30(6):893-907. PubMed ID: 12450093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using response time modeling to distinguish memory and decision processes in recognition and source tasks.
    Starns JJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1357-72. PubMed ID: 25102773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory.
    Onyper SV; Zhang YX; Howard MW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):341-64. PubMed ID: 20438255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Item strength influences source confidence and alters source memory zROC slopes.
    Starns JJ; Ksander JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 26371494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Remember" source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process.
    Slotnick SD
    Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 19937493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition receiver operating characteristic asymmetry: Increased noise or information?
    Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Feb; 49(2):216-229. PubMed ID: 36996188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.