BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22080719)

  • 1. Fee-for-service and managed care for seniors and people with disabilities on Medicaid: implications for the managed care mandate in California.
    Graham CL; Kurtovich E; Ivey SL; Neuhauser L
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2011 Nov; 22(4):1413-23. PubMed ID: 22080719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Market and beneficiary characteristics associated with enrollment in Medicare managed care plans and fee-for-service.
    Shimada SL; Zaslavsky AM; Zaborski LB; O'Malley AJ; Heller A; Cleary PD
    Med Care; 2009 May; 47(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 19365291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of Medicaid managed care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.
    Bindman AB; Chattopadhyay A; Osmond DH; Huen W; Bacchetti P
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15663700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The long-term effects of Medicaid managed care on obstetrics care in three California counties.
    Tai-Seale M; LoSasso AT; Freund DA; Gerber SE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Aug; 36(4):751-71. PubMed ID: 11508638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicaid beneficiaries in california reported less positive experiences when assigned to a managed care plan.
    McDonnell DD; Graham CL
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2015 Mar; 34(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 25732495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.
    Landon BE; Zaslavsky AM; Bernard SL; Cioffi MJ; Cleary PD
    JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(14):1744-52. PubMed ID: 15082702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Racial and ethnic differences in receipt of primary care services between medicaid fee-for-service and managed care plans.
    Seligman HK; Chattopadhyay A; Vittinghoff E; Bindman AB
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2007; 30(3):264-73. PubMed ID: 17581438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cesarean section rates in fee-for-service versus managed care patients in the Ohio Medicaid population, 1992-1997.
    Koroukian SM; Bush D; Rimm AA
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Feb; 7(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 11216331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the type of Medicare insurance associated with colorectal cancer screening prevalence and selection of screening strategy?
    Schneider EC; Rosenthal M; Gatsonis CG; Zheng J; Epstein AM
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S84-90. PubMed ID: 18725838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandated managed care for blind and disabled Medicaid beneficiaries in a county-organized health system: implementation challenges and access issues.
    Hawkinson ZC; Frates JE
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):829-36. PubMed ID: 11067379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health services appraisal and the transition to Medicaid Managed Care from fee for service.
    Owen R; Heller T; Bowers A
    Disabil Health J; 2016 Apr; 9(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 26632026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of a decline in Colorado Medicaid managed care enrollment on access and quality of preventive primary care services.
    Berman S; Armon C; Todd J
    Pediatrics; 2005 Dec; 116(6):1474-9. PubMed ID: 16322173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assessments by sick and healthy beneficiaries in traditional Medicare and Medicare managed care.
    Keenan PS; Elliott MN; Cleary PD; Zaslavsky AM; Landon BE
    Med Care; 2009 Aug; 47(8):882-8. PubMed ID: 19543123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use.
    Sisk JE; Gorman SA; Reisinger AL; Glied SA; DuMouchel WH; Hynes MM
    JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 8667539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preventive service use and Medicaid managed care in New York City.
    Reisinger AL; Sisk JE
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jan; 6(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 11009746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caregivers' ratings of access: do children with special health care needs fare better under fee-for-service or partially capitated managed care?
    Mitchell JM; Gaskin DJ
    Med Care; 2007 Feb; 45(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 17224777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Payment levels, resource use, and insurance risk of medicaid versus private insured in three states.
    Adams EK; Bronstein JM; Becker ER; Hood CR
    J Health Care Finance; 2001; 28(1):72-91. PubMed ID: 11669295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The implementation of managed behavioral healthcare in Colorado and the effects on older Medicaid beneficiaries.
    Kaskie B; Wallace N; Kang S; Bloom J
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2006 Mar; 9(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 16733268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicaid beneficiaries under managed care: provider choice and satisfaction.
    Temkin-Greener H; Winchell M
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Oct; 26(4):509-29. PubMed ID: 1917503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In California, Medi-Cal managed care is superior to Medi-Cal fee-for-service.
    Bruno R; Gilbert BP
    Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(4):7-14. PubMed ID: 10185780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.