178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22081113)
1. Epidrum(®): a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle.
Sawada A; Kii N; Yoshikawa Y; Yamakage M
J Anesth; 2012 Apr; 26(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 22081113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Epidrum, Epi-Jet, and Loss of Resistance syringe techniques for identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients.
Kartal S; Kösem B; Kılınç H; Köşker H; Karabayırlı S; Çimen NK; Demircioğlu RI
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 20(8):992-997. PubMed ID: 28891544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Usefulness of Epidrum for teaching identification of the epidural space].
Hirabayashi T; Kawamata T; Sakamoto A; Ikeno S; Minemura H; Ide S; Kurato T; Kawamata M
Masui; 2011 Sep; 60(9):1078-81. PubMed ID: 21950041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The techniques to identify the epidural space do not influence the success rate in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a comparison between loss-of-resistance and hanging-drop].
Kobayashi Y; Ichimiya T; Sekine R; Toriyabe M; Seki S; Namiki A
Masui; 2001 May; 50(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 11424463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of loss of resistance technique between Epidrum® and conventional method for identifying the epidural space.
Kim SW; Kim YM; Kim SH; Chung MH; Choi YR; Choi EM
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2012 Apr; 62(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 22558497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia].
Vandermeersch E; Kick O; Möllmann M; de Gouw N; Van Aken H
Reg Anaesth; 1991 Dec; 14(6):108-12. PubMed ID: 1780487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Sequential analgesia. Technical aspects].
Brassier J
Cah Anesthesiol; 1992; 40(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 1297531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinal epidural anaesthesia. A new combination system.
Lifschitz R; Jedeikin R
Anaesthesia; 1992 Jun; 47(6):503-5. PubMed ID: 1616089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness and accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for epidurssal landmark and depth assessment by anesthesiology residents.
Kimizuka M; Tokinaga Y; Taguchi M; Takahashi K; Yamakage M
J Anesth; 2022 Dec; 36(6):693-697. PubMed ID: 36029336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No risk of metal toxicity in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
Holst D; Möllmann M; Schymroszcyk B; Ebel C; Wendt M
Anesth Analg; 1999 Feb; 88(2):393-7. PubMed ID: 9972763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of the needle bevel during spinal and epidural anesthesia.
Baumgarten RK
Reg Anesth; 1995; 20(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 7547661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of technical and block characteristics of different combined spinal and epidural anesthesia techniques.
Puolakka R; Pitkänen MT; Rosenberg PH
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2001; 26(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11172506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False Loss of Resistance in Cervical Epidural Injection: The Loss of Resistance Technique Compared with the Epidrum Guidance in Locating Epidural Space.
Lee JY; Lee SM; Sim WS; Ahn HJ; Park MH; Lim HY; Lee SH; Kim YR; Kim YI; Bang YJ
Pain Physician; 2016 Mar; 19(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 27008286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using two different techniques.
Joshi GP; McCarroll SM
Reg Anesth; 1994; 19(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 7999651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Through the needle or in separate spaces?
Lyons G; Macdonald R; Mikl B
Anaesthesia; 1992 Mar; 47(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 1566985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of needle deviation during regional anesthetic techniques in a laboratory model.
Kopacz DJ; Allen HW
Anesth Analg; 1995 Sep; 81(3):630-3. PubMed ID: 7653834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot study to compare epidural identification and catheterization using a saline-filled syringe versus a continuous hydrostatic pressure system.
Samhan YM; El-Sabae HH; Khafagy HF; Maher MA
J Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):607-10. PubMed ID: 23408046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of 29-gauge spinal needles and a fixation device with combined spinal epidural technique.
Simsa J
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1994 Jul; 38(5):439-41. PubMed ID: 7941936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of a lockable combined spinal-epidural device for use with needle-through-needle technique].
Tanaka N; Ohkubo S; Takasaki M
Masui; 2004 Feb; 53(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 15011426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the hanging-drop technique and running-drip method for identifying the epidural space in dogs.
Martinez-Taboada F; Redondo JI
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 44(2):329-336. PubMed ID: 28214220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
