These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22081276)

  • 1. Revisiting backward recall and benchmark memory effects: a reply to Bireta et al. (2010).
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Burns SC; Chamberland C
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 22081276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the effect of lexical variables in backward recall.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):312-24. PubMed ID: 21928932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Backward recall and benchmark effects of working memory.
    Bireta TJ; Fry SE; Jalbert A; Neath I; Surprenant AM; Tehan G; Tolan GA
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Apr; 38(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 20234018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additional evidence that valence does not affect serial recall.
    Guitard D; Neath I; Saint-Aubin J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Aug; 76(8):1790-1796. PubMed ID: 36073985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The word length effect in backward recall: the role of response modality.
    Saint-Aubin J; Beaudry O; Guitard D; Pâquet M; Guérard K
    Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 32422069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The irrelevant speech effect in backward recall is modulated by foreknowledge of recall direction and response modality.
    Guitard D; Saint-Aubin J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 75(3):245-260. PubMed ID: 33779189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?
    Fallon AB; Mak E; Tehan G; Daly C
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15948620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does neighborhood size really cause the word length effect?
    Guitard D; Saint-Aubin J; Tehan G; Tolan A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):244-260. PubMed ID: 29019157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word length and age influences on forward and backward immediate serial recall.
    Baker R; Tehan G; Tehan H
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 21761268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Backward recall and the word length effect.
    Surprenant AM; Brown MA; Jalbert A; Neath I; Bireta TJ; Tehan G
    Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 21506452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal short-term memory as an articulatory system: evidence from an alternative paradigm.
    Cheung H; Wooltorton L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):195-223. PubMed ID: 11873847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
    Neath I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forward and backward recall: Different visuospatial processes when you know what's coming.
    Guitard D; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Miller LM; Tolan A
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):111-126. PubMed ID: 31346926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonological effects in forward and backward serial recall: qualitative and quantitative differences.
    Ritchie G; Tolan GA; Tehan G; Goh HE; Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 25437297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concreteness effects in different tasks: implications for models of short-term memory.
    Romani C; McAlpine S; Martin RC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):292-323. PubMed ID: 17853203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of lexical factors on recall from working memory: Generalizing the neighborhood size effect.
    Derraugh LS; Neath I; Surprenant AM; Beaudry O; Saint-Aubin J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 27281676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.